2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The interplay between plankton and particles in the Isfjorden waters influenced by marine- and land-terminating glaciers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regardless of the considered size fraction and the studied fjord system, the distribution patterns of particles and plankton patches was not repeatable in subsequent years on the same locations of transects, except for the permanently greater particles accumulation at glacier fronts (Supplementary Figures 2, 3; Figures 5, 6). This regularity in concentration hot posts could be a results of increased biological production due to an additional supply of nutrients by tidewater glaciers (Halbach et al, 2019;McGovern et al, 2020) and/or increased discharge and flocculation of particles (Trudnowska et al, 2014;Szeligowska et al, 2020;Szeligowska et al, 2021). In general, the observed distribution patterns of plankton and particles did not clearly reflect the patterns of the environmental water structuring (Figure 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Regardless of the considered size fraction and the studied fjord system, the distribution patterns of particles and plankton patches was not repeatable in subsequent years on the same locations of transects, except for the permanently greater particles accumulation at glacier fronts (Supplementary Figures 2, 3; Figures 5, 6). This regularity in concentration hot posts could be a results of increased biological production due to an additional supply of nutrients by tidewater glaciers (Halbach et al, 2019;McGovern et al, 2020) and/or increased discharge and flocculation of particles (Trudnowska et al, 2014;Szeligowska et al, 2020;Szeligowska et al, 2021). In general, the observed distribution patterns of plankton and particles did not clearly reflect the patterns of the environmental water structuring (Figure 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The major contributors to the total abundance were Gymnodinium spp., Heterocapsa rotundata (both Dinophyceae), Plagioselmis prolonga, Teleaulax sp. (both Cryptophyceae), and other free-living, small cryptophytes and undetermined nanoflagellates, typical for summer West Spitsbergen water [4,14,56,57]. Commonly observed biflagellates (3-7 µm in size), at least some of which are motile morphotypes of P. pouchetii, characterised the termination of a Phaeocystis bloom ([58], Figure 7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its relatively high potential for climatic research and logistical availability (close to Longyearbyen, the largest settlement in Svalbard), only a few protists studies were published for Isfjorden [4,[9][10][11][12][13][14]. In this respect, the Kongsfjorden (79 • N) communities are better known, and their sizeable inter-annual variability with no apparent long-term trend, potentially steered by AW inflows, has been already shown (e.g., [15][16][17]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…gelatinous zooplankton) are also hindered due to e.g. clogging of their tentacles by marine aggregates 11 , and thus they might not be as successful relative to visual predators 32 as it was previously shown in Norwegian fjords 33 . Additionally, the vertical positioning of zooplankton may be influenced by upwelling, as meltwater at the fronts of marine-terminating glaciers enters the marine environment at depth and forms a buoyant plume that transports zooplankton to the surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Synchronized diel vertical migrations during the midnight sun were not observed in Arctic zooplankton 24 26 and it is assumed that individuals respond to their own needs rather than as a population. Thus, zooplankton still feeding in the upper water layer can be affected by turbid plumes that control the depth of the euphotic zone, which directly influences primary production 30 as well as phytoplankton composition and distribution 11 . Consequently, it is expected to force primarily herbivorous zooplankton such as Calanus spp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%