2016
DOI: 10.1002/pro.2962
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The interplay between effector binding and allostery in an engineered protein switch

Abstract: The protein design rules for engineering allosteric regulation are not well understood. A fundamental understanding of the determinants of ligand binding in an allosteric context could facilitate the design and construction of versatile protein switches and biosensors. Here, we conducted extensive in vitro and in vivo characterization of the effects of 285 unique point mutations at 15 residues in the maltose-binding pocket of the maltose-activated b-lactamase MBP317-347. MBP317-347 is an allosteric enzyme form… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, engineering these switches is still far from rational; it entails extensive trial-and-error and/or directed evolution, particularly with regards to the linkers used for tethering together the functional modules 12 . Individual point mutants can also tune the behavior of such protein switches, through effects on either the input domain (effector binding) and/or the output domain (catalysis) 13 . While combinatorial libraries of randomized gene insertions and their point mutants can be tested to find combinations with the desired effect, it will nonetheless be advantageous to instead design these types of switches in a more rational way: this will enable the switch’s output(s) to not only be predicted, but also tuned for use in different environments and timescales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, engineering these switches is still far from rational; it entails extensive trial-and-error and/or directed evolution, particularly with regards to the linkers used for tethering together the functional modules 12 . Individual point mutants can also tune the behavior of such protein switches, through effects on either the input domain (effector binding) and/or the output domain (catalysis) 13 . While combinatorial libraries of randomized gene insertions and their point mutants can be tested to find combinations with the desired effect, it will nonetheless be advantageous to instead design these types of switches in a more rational way: this will enable the switch’s output(s) to not only be predicted, but also tuned for use in different environments and timescales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these systems, protein structures change in response to input signals (ligands, pH, etc. ), leading to outputs such as altered ligand affinities and enzymatic activities. Examples of protein switches include a barnase/ubiquitin system and a maltose binding protein/β-lactamase system where the catalytic activity is modulated by maltose. , These switches can be used in applications including biosensors, therapeutic agents, and smart biomaterials.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to explore the structural basis of local amino acid residues important to the allosterism generated by domain insertion, Choi and coworkers [61] used the engineered protein MBP317-347 for the construction of 285 mutants. MBP317-347 binding pocket was the target for all possible amino acid replacements at 15 positions, which were selected due to their known involvement with maltose binding.…”
Section: Protein Switches Based On Antibiotic Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%