2006
DOI: 10.1093/pa/gsl004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Internet and the Public: Online and Offline Political Participation in the United Kingdom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
119
1
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 204 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
119
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of Twitter, Facebook, Tumblr, Reddit, Instagram and other forms of digital communication mean that it has become increasingly common for citizens to publicise political information and messages on behalf of and about candidates and parties -and of course to discuss them. In this way, they can participate in campaigns in a meaningful way even if the full extent of the effects of online participation remains unclear at present (Di Gennaro & Dutton 2006;Visser and Stolle 2014;Freezel 2016). On the one hand, this development leads us to wonder whether the GIM is still a valid tool for capturing the incentives that lead members to participate in modern forms of online campaign as well as in more traditional ones.…”
Section: Theoretical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of Twitter, Facebook, Tumblr, Reddit, Instagram and other forms of digital communication mean that it has become increasingly common for citizens to publicise political information and messages on behalf of and about candidates and parties -and of course to discuss them. In this way, they can participate in campaigns in a meaningful way even if the full extent of the effects of online participation remains unclear at present (Di Gennaro & Dutton 2006;Visser and Stolle 2014;Freezel 2016). On the one hand, this development leads us to wonder whether the GIM is still a valid tool for capturing the incentives that lead members to participate in modern forms of online campaign as well as in more traditional ones.…”
Section: Theoretical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet research consistently shows online mobilisation has a lower if not a minimal effect in encouraging offline forms of participation (Quintelier & Vissers, 2008). In the UK, studies largely reinforce this finding (Ward et al, 2003;Di Gennaro & Dutton, 2006) although more recent research has found more complex suites of participation exist where the online and offline spheres are bridged (Gibson & Cantijoch, 2013). Again, however, there is no indication of the motivations underpinning suites of activities.…”
Section: Motivations Mobilisation and Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, we need to know more about the role of digital media in the relationship between citizens and political institutions from the perspective of those who are attempting to stimulate citizens to become engaged. Most studies of the contribution of digital media to public engagement focus on their effects upon public behaviour (Gennaro & Dutton, 2006), the use of social networking sites by politicians as individuals (Coleman & Moss, 2008) or by political parties as collective bodies. Fewer studies have explored how local government strategies to engage with citizens have been supported, complicated or even hindered by the use of digital media.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moving on from the Council's current use of digital media, we look at how actors perceive the advantages and disadvantages of these technologies. Previous studies have claimed on the one hand that digital media have the potential to reach those who are isolated from society and estranged from politics because of social inequality, and on the other that they exacerbate existing social inequalities (Gennaro & Dutton, 2006), widen existing knowledge gaps and simply make it easier for those who are already interested in politics to get more involved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%