The ‘internationalisation agenda’ and the rise of the Chinese university: Towards the inevitable erosion of academic freedom?

Abstract

This essay is a critical reflection on the challenge to academic freedom presented by the globalisation of practices of knowledge production. It explores a tension within the logic of the internationalisation agenda: UK universities are premised upon forms of knowledge production whose roots lie in European Enlightenment values of rationalism, empiricism and universalism, yet partnerships are growing with universities premised on rather different, non-liberal and, perhaps, incommensurable values. Therefore, in advancing the internationalisation agenda in non-liberal environments, UK-based scholars find themselves caught between a rock and a hard place: either legitimising and sustaining the subjection of knowledge production to the state on one hand, or engaging in a form of epistemological colonialism by demanding adherence to ‘our values’ on the other. Using Chinese research culture as an illustration, the article contributes to ongoing debate on the ethics of social science research collaboration with universities based in contrasting epistemological cultures.

Academic Freedom: Understanding and Experience of Higher Education Lecturers in Indonesia

“…Lecturers understand this freedom as freedom from campus, government, industry, and religion, ethnicity, and gender. The results of this research reinforce the notion that general academic freedom is open to the possibility of interpretation and debate [33,34]. Textually the general statement of academic freedom is seen in the document [35].…”

The core epistemic responsibilities of universities: results from a Delphi study

“…On the one hand, societal factors influence what universities can and cannot do, which is most clear for the topic of academic freedom. Panellists suggested that the role of individual universities in cultivating and safeguarding academic freedom is fairly constrained, as exercising and protecting academic freedom is difficult in politically unstable or authoritative states (Owen, 2020;. On the other hand, many of the responsibilities can be shared by universities collectively.…”

Mapping practices and spatiality in IR knowledge production: from detachment to emancipation

“…A more critical reading of globality thus recognises stratification within and between cores and peripheries (Cheng and Brettle, 2019; Cox and Nossal, 2009; Kristensen, 2015). Furthermore, as universities in the non-West climb international rankings, bringing with them alternative epistemological and pedagogical practices, academic perceptions of what constitutes the ‘core’ are also shifting (Owen, 2020). With the emergence of a multipolar world in which numerous sites of domination exist, it is anachronistic to assume that ‘the West’ remains the only centre of knowledge production in IR.…”