2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/9506979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The International Prognostic Index for Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Has the Higher Value in Predicting Overall Outcome Compared with the Barcelona-Brno Biomarkers Only Prognostic Model and the MD Anderson Cancer Center Prognostic Index

Abstract: In recent years, new prognostic indexes (PIs) for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), which include clinical, biological, and genetic variables, have been validated, highlighting the MD Anderson Cancer Center prognostic index (MDACC PI), the CLL-international prognostic index (CLL-IPI), and the Barcelona-Brno biomarkers only prognostic model. The aim of this study is to compare the utility of these PIs in a cohort of Spanish patients. A retrospective analysis of 696 unselected CLL patients newly diagnosed and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 5-year treatment-free survival in the Mayo validation cohort of previously untreated patients in the low, intermediate, high, and very-high risk CLL-IPI groups was 78%, 54%, 32%, and 0%, respectively. Other studies have also confirmed the ability of the CLL-IPI risk score in predicting time to first therapy in previously untreated CLL patients 31 33 .…”
Section: Contemporary Risk Stratification In Cllmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The 5-year treatment-free survival in the Mayo validation cohort of previously untreated patients in the low, intermediate, high, and very-high risk CLL-IPI groups was 78%, 54%, 32%, and 0%, respectively. Other studies have also confirmed the ability of the CLL-IPI risk score in predicting time to first therapy in previously untreated CLL patients 31 33 .…”
Section: Contemporary Risk Stratification In Cllmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Of note, the single-center study, which enrolled only 218 patients, can predict TTFT but not TTNT. In addition, CLL-IPI has a higher value in predicting the overall outcome [101]. To evaluate CLL-IPI in R/R CLL with novel therapy, Jacob D. Soumerai et al found that the value of each prognostic indicator might be different compared with untreated CLL [19].…”
Section: Risk Staging Systems In Cllmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most established today is the CLL-International Prognostic Index (CLL-IPI), which has demonstrated its ability to predict overall survival (OS), time to first therapy (TTFT) and progression-free survival (PFS) in the CIT setting [ 34 , 35 ]. It has also shown to predict TTFT in early-stage CLL [ 36 ] and community-based cohorts of patients [ 37 , 38 ]. However, its utility to predict PFS and even OS in patients treated with Tas is limited [ 39 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%