2016
DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01181-2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The international primary ciliary dyskinesia cohort (iPCD Cohort): methods and first results

Abstract: Data on primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) epidemiology is scarce and published studies are characterised by low numbers. In the framework of the European Union project BESTCILIA we aimed to combine all available datasets in a retrospective international PCD cohort (iPCD Cohort).We identified eligible datasets by performing a systematic review of published studies containing clinical information on PCD, and by contacting members of past and current European Respiratory Society Task Forces on PCD. We compared the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
80
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
80
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…2) We must learn more about variability in outcome measures in patients with PCD. This study's data and further observational data collected in international datasets such as the Provalf cohort planned as part of the European Union COST Action BEAT-PCD [26], the international PCD (iPCD) cohort study [27], and the international PCD registry [28] will be important. 3) We need more sensitive outcome measures such as disease-specific quality-of-life instruments (not yet available when this study was conducted) and sensitive lung function measurements [14,16].…”
Section: Family Support and Role Of Patient Organisationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) We must learn more about variability in outcome measures in patients with PCD. This study's data and further observational data collected in international datasets such as the Provalf cohort planned as part of the European Union COST Action BEAT-PCD [26], the international PCD (iPCD) cohort study [27], and the international PCD registry [28] will be important. 3) We need more sensitive outcome measures such as disease-specific quality-of-life instruments (not yet available when this study was conducted) and sensitive lung function measurements [14,16].…”
Section: Family Support and Role Of Patient Organisationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, definitions of important outcomes can vary considerably, hampering comparisons [34]. Pulmonary exacerbation, for example, has been defined in one study as any change in respiratory status that requires intravenous antibiotic treatment [53], and in another as the need for systemic antibiotics and/or a decline of FEV1 % predicted of ⩾10% [62].…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cut-off values vary considerably between centres, as they depend on local expertise, equipment, techniques, and laboratory and sample conditions [34].…”
Section: Standardising Reporting On Diagnostic Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagnostic workup includes a combination of different techniques such as nasal nitric oxide measurement, high-speed video microscopy analysis, electron microscopy, and genetic analysis because there is no single gold standard due to the genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity of the disease [1,2].Due to the chronic nature of the disease, difficulty in expectorating respiratory secretions, chronic presence of symptoms such as productive cough, and requirement of daily treatment, this disease poses a burden on the patients and their families. PCD negatively impacts quality of life (QOL) because of disease complications as well as treatment burden.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagnostic workup includes a combination of different techniques such as nasal nitric oxide measurement, high-speed video microscopy analysis, electron microscopy, and genetic analysis because there is no single gold standard due to the genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity of the disease [1,2].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%