The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) Consensus on Science With Treatment Recommendations for Pediatric and Neonatal Patients: Pediatric Basic and Advanced Life Support

Abstract

This publication contains the pediatric and neonatal sections of the 2005 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations (COSTR). The consensus process that produced this document was sponsored by the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR). ILCOR was formed in 1993 and consists of representatives of resuscitation councils from all over the world. Its mission is to identify and review international science and knowledge relevant to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and emergency cardiovascular care (ECC) and to generate consensus on treatment recommendations. ECC includes all responses necessary to treat life-threatening cardiovascular and respiratory events. The COSTR document presents international consensus statements on the science of resuscitation. ILCOR member organizations are each publishing resuscitation guidelines that are consistent with the science in this consensus document, but they also take into consideration geographic, economic, and system differences in practice and the regional availability of medical devices and drugs. The American Heart Association (AHA) pediatric and the American Academy of Pediatrics/AHA neonatal sections of the resuscitation guidelines are reprinted in this issue of Pediatrics (see pages e978-e988). The 2005 evidence evaluation process began shortly after publication of the 2000 International Guidelines for CPR and ECC. The process included topic identification, expert topic review, discussion and debate at 6 international meetings, further review, and debate within ILCOR member organizations and ultimate approval by the member organizations, an Editorial Board, and peer reviewers. The complete COSTR document was published simultaneously in Circulation (International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. 2005 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. Circulation. 2005;112(suppl):73-90) and Resuscitation (International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. 2005 International Consensus Conference on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. Resuscitation. 2005;67:271-291). Readers are encouraged to review the 2005 COSTR document in its entirety. It can be accessed through the CPR and ECC link at the AHA Web site: www.americanheart.org. The complete publication represents the largest evaluation of resuscitation literature ever published and contains electronic links to more detailed information about the international collaborative process. To organize the evidence evaluation, ILCOR representatives established 6 task forces: basic life support, advanced life support, acute coronary syndromes, pediatric life support, neonatal life support, and an interdisciplinary task force to consider overlapping topics such as educational issues. The AHA established additional task forces on stroke and, in collaboration with the American Red Cro...

Clinical practice parameters for hemodynamic support of pediatric and neonatal septic shock: 2007 update from the American College of Critical Care Medicine*

“…The American Heart Association/PALS guidelines for children recommends the initial use of epinephrine by peripheral IV or interosseous for cardiopulmonary resuscitation or post-cardiopulmonary resuscitation shock, and by the intramuscular route for ana-phylaxis (176). Even though a common perception, there is no data clarifying if the peripheral infiltration of epinephrine produces more local damage than observed with dopamine.…”

First quantitative analysis of cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality during in-hospital cardiac arrests of young children

“…14–16 There is no question that future studies should evaluate novel interventions, both educational and technological, to improve CPR quality, but these data should begin to raise doubt as to whether these depths can actually be attained clinically. While the Guidelines are developed using a rigorous evidence evaluation process, 36 little data has been collected from young children in cardiac arrest. As an example, in the most recent Guideline revision, using CT 37,38 and anthropometric data 17 collected from healthy children, expert consensus decided that the real “risk” to the child is for providers to not push hard enough, so the recommended depth for children was increased, even though there was little evidence to suggest that we could achieve such depths.…”

2010 American Heart Association recommended compression depths during pediatric in-hospital resuscitations are associated with survival

“…14 Unfortunately, pediatric resuscitation guidelines have largely been developed by expert clinical consensus, using extrapolated data due to a paucity of evidence collected from actual children in cardiac arrest. 15 To our knowledge, no study has associated CPR quality with survival outcomes during pediatric resuscitations, highlighting one of the major gaps in the pediatric resuscitation science knowledge base.…”