2013
DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2013.800737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The International Criminal Court: limits, potential and conditions for the promotion of justice and peace

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some scholars see the ICC as important in promoting international justice and preventing serious crimes, but its efficacy is constrained by structural and political factors such as limited resources, institutional restrictions and manipulation by states (Ainley, 2001;Gegout, 2013;Simmons & Danner, 2010). The selection of cases has been controversial and perceived as influenced by powerful states -resembling almost as a neo-colonial project rather than an impartial organ of justice (Ainley, 2001).…”
Section: International Criminal Courtmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Some scholars see the ICC as important in promoting international justice and preventing serious crimes, but its efficacy is constrained by structural and political factors such as limited resources, institutional restrictions and manipulation by states (Ainley, 2001;Gegout, 2013;Simmons & Danner, 2010). The selection of cases has been controversial and perceived as influenced by powerful states -resembling almost as a neo-colonial project rather than an impartial organ of justice (Ainley, 2001).…”
Section: International Criminal Courtmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although the ICC is criticized to have focused on Africa, 73 it has conducted preliminary investigations worldwide: "Iraq, Venezuela and Colombia (2006); Afghanistan (2007); Georgia and Sri Lanka (2008); Gaza, Honduras and South Korea (2010)". 74 However, these investigations have not resulted in any indictment for various reasons: crimes were insufficient in number, national justice systems were able to deal with the situations, investigations are ongoing and/or the ICC cannot legally address some crimes committed in a state not party to the Rome Statute.…”
Section: Alternative Justifications For Icc's Operations Worldwidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ICC has faced a number of challenges from different states, some of which have not ratified the Rome Statute or withdrawn their membership. They have objections about the effectiveness of ICC's trial, biases to particular regions, and the fairness of its case selection and trial procedures (Gegout 2013). Nouwen and Werner (2010) showed how both Uganda and Sudan warring parties have used the ICC's intervention based on their interests when portraying themselves as a friend of ICC and their opponents as enemies to humankind.…”
Section: International Criminal Court (Icc)mentioning
confidence: 99%