The international contribution to occupational health research

Ferris, Mark; Hirst, Adrian; Sanati, Negin A; Sanati, Kaveh A.

doi:10.5271/sjweh.3488

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 3 publications

(2 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…First is the growth of work, health and safety research production globally. There appears to be a rapid growth in health and safety literature (Ferris et al, 2015;Li et al, 2012;Rollin, Darmoni, Caillard, & Gehanno, 2009;Sweileh et al, 2014). The sheer volume of research makes it challenging to transfer the relevant findings or evidence to the audiences that can best use them to inform practice or policy.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, prevention programs and interventions are varied and may not be based on the best available evidence. Researchers in health and safety continue to produce and publish scientific evidence (Ferris¸Hirst, Sanati, & Sanati, 2015;Gehanno, Takahashi, Darmoni, & Weber, 2007;H€ arm€ a, Viikari-Juntura E, & O'Donoghue-Lindy, 2015;Jackson Filho, Algranti, Saito, & Garcia, 2015;Li, Liu, & Zhang, 2012;Navarro & Mart ın, 2004;Sweileh, Zyoud, Al-Jabi, & Sawalha, 2014). Is the available evidence from the scientific literature getting to and influencing prevention programs and interventions at workplaces?…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Knowledge transfer and exchange in health and safety: a rapid review

Eerd

2019

Policy and Practice in Health and Safety

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Workplace injury and illness can be burdensome for workers and workplaces regardless of jurisdiction. The notion of research to practice is important in health and safety research. The objective of this article is to describe and synthesize the literature describing knowledge transfer and exchange (KTE) approaches relevant to workplaces. A rapid review of the literature was done. Search strategies were run in eight electronic databases. Documents describing a KTE approach for workplaces were reviewed. Data related to key aspects of the KTE approach as well as conceptual guidance were extracted and synthesized. Literature searches revealed 34 documents that described 23 different KTE approaches designed to reach workplace audiences. Many KTE approaches were guided by conceptual frameworks. Common elements related to audience, activities and impact were found to guide future KTE approaches. Including workplace parties as an audience in a multifaceted approach are important principles of KTE for health and safety.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Knowledge transfer and exchange in health and safety: a rapid review

Eerd

2019

Policy and Practice in Health and Safety

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

A Systematic Review of Ethics Knowledge in Audiology Literature: A Follow-Up Study (2011–2020)

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: This systematic review aimed to update and explore the extant literature (2011–2020) regarding ethics knowledge in audiology and to compare the findings to an earlier study (2001–2010). Method: This systematic review employed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Results: MEDLINE, CINAHL, ERIC, MasterFILE Premier, E-Journals, Africa-Wide information and Academic Search Premier electronic databases, and non–peer-reviewed papers in Seminars in Hearing yielded a total of 63 papers. Following systematic screening using inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 12 full-text papers were included in this review. Pertinent data and findings from the review were tabulated and analyzed using a qualitative, deductive approach. Results showed that the 12 papers were published in nine peer-reviewed journals with a predominantly social scientific approach. This differs from the earlier review that reported only five papers with a predominantly philosophical approach. However, both the current and earlier studies focused on the rehabilitation/management role of the audiologist. In the earlier study, the focus was on moral judgment (as one of the components of moral behavior), whereas this was the focus of only half of the papers identified in this study, with the remaining papers focusing on moral sensitivity and moral motivation. Conclusions: The focus of papers had evolved and continued to include more elements related to the multiple perspectives used to analyze and describe ethics research. The body of knowledge of ethics in audiology specifically expanded in the area of social scientific research, focusing on beneficence and nonmaleficence, including moral motivation and basing research on moral judgment with the emphasis on the rehabilitation/management and education/research/administration role of audiologists.

show abstract