1965
DOI: 10.2307/3798051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Internal Food Reserves of Hatching Mallard Ducklings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
1
1

Year Published

1978
1978
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
22
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Their mean weight (27 g) was considerably lower than the 35 g hatching weight reported by Kear (1965) and Smart (1965). We attribute the difference to the use of internal food reserves and dehydration that occurred during transit (Kear 1965;Marcstrom 1966). However, the ducks gained rapidly during their 1st week, and the effect of dehydration on subsequent growth is considered negligible.…”
Section: Growthcontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Their mean weight (27 g) was considerably lower than the 35 g hatching weight reported by Kear (1965) and Smart (1965). We attribute the difference to the use of internal food reserves and dehydration that occurred during transit (Kear 1965;Marcstrom 1966). However, the ducks gained rapidly during their 1st week, and the effect of dehydration on subsequent growth is considered negligible.…”
Section: Growthcontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Marcstrom (1966, have repeatedly stated that mallard ducklings and eggs from Sweden are generally heavier than those from England. But, as shown in Table 4, the egg sizes obtained by Kear (1965) and Marcstrom (1966) from captive ducks are not representative of those obtained from wild mallards in either England or Sweden. Captive mallards, usually given high-protein food ad libitum, begin to lay larger eggs as early as the first generation (Batt and Prince 1979;this study).…”
Section: Egg Sizementioning
confidence: 69%
“…parental investment in care), which serves as a post-hatching source of nutrients and energy that can affect survivorship, especially during times of nutritional stress. A number of studies of precocial species (Kear, 1965;Ankney, 1980;Peach and Thomas, 1986;Thomas et al, 1988;Slattery and Alisauskas, 1995;Visser and Ricklefs, 1995;Dawson and Clark, 1996;Nager et al, 2000;Anderson and Alisauskas, 2001) have shown that an increase in residual yolk, correlated with increased egg size, results in increased hatchling survival under limited food conditions.…”
Section: Table·1 Hatchling Organ Masses (G) and Their Regressions Onmentioning
confidence: 99%