1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0266-3538(97)00047-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The interlaminar and intralaminar fracture toughness of carbon-fibre/polymer composites: The effect of temperature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Jackson and Ratcliffe [7] found that the stress intensity factor is not affected significantly by the morphology of The data reduction for CT or CC specimens made of an orthotropic material requires particular attention. Other researchers have used the stress intensity factor approach [2,8,9], often citing the ASTM standard E399 [10] for the determination of the fracture toughness in metals using CT tests [2,8].…”
Section: Test Methods and Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Jackson and Ratcliffe [7] found that the stress intensity factor is not affected significantly by the morphology of The data reduction for CT or CC specimens made of an orthotropic material requires particular attention. Other researchers have used the stress intensity factor approach [2,8,9], often citing the ASTM standard E399 [10] for the determination of the fracture toughness in metals using CT tests [2,8].…”
Section: Test Methods and Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the Mode I DCB specimens, which exhibit continuous crack growth along the fiber/matrix interface, Mode II ENF specimens show discontinuous crack growth by micro-crack coalescence, leading to the development of hackles at the fracture surface. In Mode II loading, fiber bridging is a less important toughening mechanism than in Mode I failure [30,38]. It is postulated that in Mode II nanotube bundles act as rigid fillers which arrest the crack, preventing or delaying the expansion of microcracking within the matrix-rich interface area.…”
Section: Modes I and Ii Interlaminar Fracture Toughnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test methods most commonly used are the centre-notched tension [1], surface-notched tension [1], Compact Tension (CT) [1][2][3][4][5], Three Point Bending (TPB) [1,6,2,7], Four Point Bending (FPB) [8,9], double edge notch [7], double cantilever beam [10] and the wedge insert fracture [11]. Investigations into size effects for the CT specimen [1] and for the FPB [9] concluded in both cases that the effect of specimen dimensions did not affect the fracture toughness appreciably.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%