1998
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.139768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Intergenerational Earnings and Income Mobility of Canadian Men: Evidence from Longitudinal Income Tax Data

Abstract: and Andreas Stich for their comments and suggestions. We would also like to thank Clive Loader for making the S-plus code used in the non-parametric analysis available to us, to acknowledge the help of Linda Standish and André St. Louis of Statistics Canada in constructing the data set, and to thank Sophie Lefebvre for her able research assistance.This paper represents the views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinions of Statistics Canada.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
168
0
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(182 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(20 reference statements)
11
168
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This hints at possible non-linearities in the intergenerational link. For example Corak & Heisz (1999) and Hertz (2005) present evidence for stronger persistence among low-income families.…”
Section: Analysis Of Migrantsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This hints at possible non-linearities in the intergenerational link. For example Corak & Heisz (1999) and Hertz (2005) present evidence for stronger persistence among low-income families.…”
Section: Analysis Of Migrantsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However while the stochastic dominance approach will identify the lack of equality of opportunity, unfortunately it does not yield a statistic which will indicate the degree of change or progress toward equality of opportunity. To see why this is, and understand why the evaluation of the progress that has been made, requires rethinking of current empirical approaches to equality of opportunity 8 Behrman and Taubman (1990), Solon (1992), Mulligan (1999), Corak and Heisz (1999), Couch and Lillard (2004), Grawe (2004), andBratsberg et al (2007) all being examples. 9 Bartholemew (1982), Blanden et al (2004), Chakravarty (1995), Dearden et al (1997), Hart (1983), Maasoumi (1986), Maasoumi (1986), Prais (1955), Shorrocks (1978), and Van de Gaer et al (2001) have all produced mobility indices many of which are discussed in Maasoumi (1996).…”
Section: Examining Progress Toward the Equal Opportunity Imperativementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the intergenerational income elasticity between fathers and sons is estimated to be 0.4 or higher in the United States (Solon 1992), 0.23 in Canada (Corak and Heisz 1999), and 0.57 in Britain (Dearden, Machin, and Reed 1997). 7 As shown empirically and theoretically by Bevan (1979), Behrman, Pollak, and Taubman (1989), Davies and Kuhn (1991), Galor and Zeira (1993), Mulligan (1999), and Restuccia and Urrutia (2004), among others, the difference in intergenerational transfers among rich and poor families is an important source of persistent income inequality, particularly when households face borrowing constraints.…”
Section: Evidence On Intergenerational Transfers and Intergenerationamentioning
confidence: 99%