1996
DOI: 10.1016/1359-6462(96)00174-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The interfacial failure sequence during fiber pushout in metal matrix composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, some authors relate the occurrence of bottom face debonding, in some cases for metal matrix composites (MMCs). [8][9][10] In the present study, bottom face debonding could be due to bending effect on the bottom face [11] or to thin slice geometry (thickness limited to less than 20 insert radii) [12].…”
Section: Failure Modementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some authors relate the occurrence of bottom face debonding, in some cases for metal matrix composites (MMCs). [8][9][10] In the present study, bottom face debonding could be due to bending effect on the bottom face [11] or to thin slice geometry (thickness limited to less than 20 insert radii) [12].…”
Section: Failure Modementioning
confidence: 99%
“…So it is necessary to use thin slices of composites to avoid the fracture of indenter or the crush of fiber [9]. Moreover, for almost all thin slice push-out tests of TMCs, it is observed that interface debonding initiates at the bottom face of the specimen due to thermal residual stresses at the interface [9][10][11][12][13]. This is different from interface debonding in ceramic matrix composites, whose debonding initiates at the top face.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, there exists high bond strength and residual stresses at the interface of TMCs owing to the strong chemical activation of titanium and the mismatch of thermal expansion coefficients between fiber and matrix. So it is necessary to use thin slices of composites to avoid the fracture of indenter or the crush of fiber [9]. Moreover, for almost all thin slice push-out tests of TMCs, it is observed that interface debonding initiates at the bottom face of the specimen due to thermal residual stresses at the interface [9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For TMCs, there exists high bonding strength at the interface owing to the strong chemical activation of titanium. Thus it is necessary to use thin slices of composites to avoid the fracture of indenter or the crush of fiber [9]. Moreover, the higher thermal residual stresses are induced at fiber/matrix interface owing to the mismatch of thermal expansion coefficients between fiber and matrix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%