Rethinking Music Through Science and Technology Studies 2021
DOI: 10.4324/9780429268830-11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The interface and instrumentality of Eurorack modular synthesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 The ambivalence of critical organology in these terms -its fluctuation between a focus on 'things' and the analysis of digital music materialities as assemblages -is played out in Hennion and Levaux (2021), a collection bringing STS to music studies. See the contrasts between Harkins (2021, which focuses on the Fairlight CMI) and Bates (2021) and Prior (2021;cf. Prior 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10 The ambivalence of critical organology in these terms -its fluctuation between a focus on 'things' and the analysis of digital music materialities as assemblages -is played out in Hennion and Levaux (2021), a collection bringing STS to music studies. See the contrasts between Harkins (2021, which focuses on the Fairlight CMI) and Bates (2021) and Prior (2021;cf. Prior 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We cannot equate materiality in digital music assemblages, then, solely with physical objects, but have to consider the materialities of code, of electromagnetic waves, indeed of sound itself -entities that stretch or defy orthodox definitions of an 'object'. But digital music's materialities are additionally complex in being inherently multiple, built of many communicating and articulated layers of hardware and software, in the sense not only that hardware always comes to us encrusted with software but that software is itself immanently multiple, composed of many layers of code, and in the way that digital and analogue devices and processes are invariably combined and mutually compounding (Born , 1997Bates 2021). 10 The digital-and-analogue assemblages that we address therefore present a formidable challenge to material analysis.…”
Section: Music Materialities Aesthetics and Stsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 The ambivalence of critical organology in these terms -its fluctuation between a focus on 'things' and the analysis of digital music materialities as assemblages -is played out in Hennion and Levaux (2021), a collection bringing STS to music studies. See the contrasts between Harkins (2021, which focuses on the Fairlight CMI) and Bates (2021) and Prior (2021;cf. Prior 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We cannot equate materiality in digital music assemblages, then, solely with physical objects, but have to consider the materialities of code, of electromagnetic waves, indeed of sound itself -entities that stretch or defy orthodox definitions of an 'object'. But digital music's materialities are additionally complex in being inherently multiple, built of many communicating and articulated layers of hardware and software, in the sense not only that hardware always comes to us encrusted with software but that software is itself immanently multiple, composed of many layers of code, and in the way that digital and analogue devices and processes are invariably combined and mutually compounding (Born , 1997Bates 2021). 10 The digital-and-analogue assemblages that we address therefore present a formidable challenge to material analysis.…”
Section: Music Materialities Aesthetics and Stsmentioning
confidence: 99%