2009
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1601845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Interbank Market after August 2007: What Has Changed, and Why?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 131 publications
3
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…During the 2007-2008 financial crisis though, liquidity in the interbank market has considerably dried up, even at short maturities, and an increasing dispersion in the credit conditions of different banks has emerged. A number of studies have investigated how movements in borrowing costs depend on bank specific characteristics such as their size and creditworthiness (1,2), or on banks ability to exploit changing market microstructure conditions (3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the 2007-2008 financial crisis though, liquidity in the interbank market has considerably dried up, even at short maturities, and an increasing dispersion in the credit conditions of different banks has emerged. A number of studies have investigated how movements in borrowing costs depend on bank specific characteristics such as their size and creditworthiness (1,2), or on banks ability to exploit changing market microstructure conditions (3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes it impossible to match e-MID trading data with balance sheet or other banks' specific data. Other studies (see Angelini et al, 2011) Another key determinant of O/N rates is the time of a transaction. While Angelini (2000) using hourly e-MID data shows no intraday pattern of interest rates, Baglioni and Monticini (2008) and Gabbi et al (2012) find a decreasing trend in the O/N rate as the trading day progresses.…”
Section: Other Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous empirical evidence (see Angelini et al (2011), Gabrieli (2011), Gabbi (2012, Bech and Atalay (2010), Akram and Christophersen (2010) and Gabrieli (2012)) suggests that being systemically more important, in term of size or connectedness, explains part of the cross-sectional variation in banks' borrowing costs before and during the 2008 global financial crisis. Our paper contributes to the recent literature that investigates the determinants of banks' borrowing costs in unsecured money markets and how network characteristics of interbank market participants affect their funding rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The recent literature highlights the role of liquidity and credit risks in explaining interbank spreads; see, for instance, Beirne (2012), Angelini, Nobili and Picillo (2011), Michaud and Upper (2008), Schwartz (2010), Eisenschmidt and Tapking (2009) and McAndrews, Sarkar and Wang (2017). Along these lines, we introduce a novel model in which interbank risk fluctuations are driven by expected and unexpected shocks.…”
Section: Second This Article Characterises Expected Fluctuations In mentioning
confidence: 99%