2017
DOI: 10.1002/smi.2760
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The interactive role of eating regulation and stress in the prediction of weight‐related outcomes among college students

Abstract: The interactive role of eating regulation and perceived stress on weight-related outcomes was examined among 319 sophomore year college students (110 males and 209 females). Moderated regressions were used to examine interactions between stress and eating regulation on study outcomes including body mass index (BMI) and body fat. Eating regulation moderated associations between stress and BMI and body fat outcomes. Students reporting high perceived stress, high autonomous eating regulation, low controlled regul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, main meal intake more than twice a day by stressed students, suggesting that the abnormal pattern of main meal taking by stressed students. These findings have further been supported by other studies showing an abnormal pattern of food intake in various other universities students [32], [33]. Arsiwalla et al .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, main meal intake more than twice a day by stressed students, suggesting that the abnormal pattern of main meal taking by stressed students. These findings have further been supported by other studies showing an abnormal pattern of food intake in various other universities students [32], [33]. Arsiwalla et al .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Arsiwalla et al . were examined interactions between stress and eating regulation in the prediction of weight-related outcomes and body fat among young adults [32]. Whereas, Nastaskin et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations