2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2015.03.063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The interactive role of cannabinoid and vanilloid systems in hippocampal synaptic plasticity in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the recovering effects of SR, like the effects of OL, were attenuated by the TRPV1 antagonist CZ, and the antirecovering effects of CZ against OL were further counteracted by SR, which may reflect the mutually controlled activation of the ECB and TRPV1 systems in memory‐related behavioural plasticity. 109 , 110 , 111 Although the detailed mechanisms underlying the discrepancy in the efficacy of CB1/TRPV1 ligands between the anxiety‐ and working memory impairment‐related behaviours remain elusive, the differences in the relevant brain regions, 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 along with polymodal regulation of synaptic plasticity involved in the two neurotransmitter systems, 116 , 117 seemed to contribute, and this may be controlled subtly at the epigenetic level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the recovering effects of SR, like the effects of OL, were attenuated by the TRPV1 antagonist CZ, and the antirecovering effects of CZ against OL were further counteracted by SR, which may reflect the mutually controlled activation of the ECB and TRPV1 systems in memory‐related behavioural plasticity. 109 , 110 , 111 Although the detailed mechanisms underlying the discrepancy in the efficacy of CB1/TRPV1 ligands between the anxiety‐ and working memory impairment‐related behaviours remain elusive, the differences in the relevant brain regions, 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 along with polymodal regulation of synaptic plasticity involved in the two neurotransmitter systems, 116 , 117 seemed to contribute, and this may be controlled subtly at the epigenetic level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fEPSP and PS were recorded 5, 30, and 60 min following the HFS for determining the alterations in the synaptic response of DG neurons. For each time point, 10 continuous evoked responses were averaged at a stimulus interval of 10 s. 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Input-output current profiles were achieved through the stimulation of the PP for determining the stimulus intensity for each rat (80% maximal population spike) (Figure 4). Single biphasic For each time point, 10 continuous evoked responses were averaged at a stimulus interval of 10 s. [47][48][49][50] The stimuli parameters were defined in homemade software followed by sending through a data acquisition board connected to a constant current isolator unit (A365 WPI) before to the PP using the stimulus electrodes. A preamplifier was employed to pass the induced field potential response from the DG and followed by amplification (1000×) (Differential amplifier DAM 80 WPI), and filtration (bandpass 1 Hz to 3 kHz).…”
Section: The Surgical Procedure Electrophysiological Recording and Lt...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PS and EPSP were recorded 60 min following HFS for determining the DG neurons’ synaptic responses. At all-time points, 10 continuous evoked responses were averaged at stimulus intervals of 10 s [ 38 , 39 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%