The Interactive Effects of Remittances on Economic Growth and Inequality in Western Balkan Countries

Abstract

Hardly any studies have investigated the impact of migrant remittances on economic growth (EG) and inequality in the Western Balkans as a whole (WB6). Using the method of instrumental variables (VI), the findings show that while remittances influence economic growth, their inflow also promotes a high level of migration and absorbs a large workforce by influencing the labor market and encouraging uncontrolled individual relocation. This paper also reveals that although remittances have eased income inequalities the share of remittances in a country’s economy has declined over the years. After testing for the endogeneity of remittances and controlling for various variables, the results indicate that migrant workers’ remittances do not provide strong support for economic growth and inequality. For the sample average, a 1-percent rise in the share of remittances in the economy (i.e., to GDP) will lead to a 0.10-percent rise in the economic cycle i.e. GDP growth, respectively will lead to a 0.05-percent drop in the share of people living in inequality. The findings also show that the interactive effect of remittances and foreign direct investment is lower on economic growth and inequality than the individual effect of each factor.

The Factors Influencing Gross Domestic Product Growth in the Post-Pandemic Period: The Case of Kosovo

“…For centuries, there have been heated debates on the sources of economic growth in emerging economies and why some countries reflect strong economic growth compared to others (Dietmar and Adela 2017). However, this research and other author studies (Bajra 2021) show that remittances influence consumption and economic growth. According to the IMF Annual report for Kosovo, Kosovo Government Economic Recovery Measures, both in 2020 and 2021, has a determinant impact on the indicators we analyzed in this study and the GDP growth of Kosovo.…”

“…Despite their profound impact on economic activity, the literature shows remittances have different effects on economic growth and inequality. Chowdhury (2016), Etonam Adetou and Fiodendji (2019), and Adams and Cuecuecha (2013) state that not only do remittances affect economic progress, but they also influence the financial system and institutional quality, reduce poverty and increase human and physical capital investment in developing countries (Bajra 2021). Durguti et al…”

An Asymmetric Investigation of Remittance and Trade Openness Impact on Inequality: Evidence From Selected South Asian Countries

“…It is hypothesized that a household's perception of its income through remittance is a major component because it determines the impact of remittances on welfare: a significant role of remittances in replacing contributions made by migrant workers and the necessity of them containing extra production information to make a significant impact on the welfare of the families. In a study, Bajra (2021) advocates that remittances and income inequality are closely linked although the effects of remittances on inequality are difficult to separate. Moreover, using a direct consumer remittance goal reduces the likelihood that the multiplier impact of remittances may be seen in all sectors of the economy.…”

The Method for Evaluation of Consumption Tax Regressivity

“…Aside from the influence on the economy and inequality, it also has long-term consequences, primarily affecting the export of labor without discrimination, thereby emptying the country of young people in pursuit of a better future, potentially increasing the risk of age dependency (Bajra, 2021)the findings show that while remittances influence economic growth, their inflow also promotes a high level of migration and absorbs a large workforce by influencing the labor market and encouraging uncontrolled individual relocation. This paper also reveals that although remittances have eased income inequalities the share of remittances in a country's economy has declined over the years.…”