DOI: 10.25148/etd.fidc001742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Interactions of Relationships, Interest, and Self-Efficacy in Undergraduate Physics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(83 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to the SOSESC-P, past studies have set precedence for reliably using this instrument to measure overall self-efficacy in introductory physics contexts (e.g. Fencl & Scheel, 2004;Trujillo & Tanner, 2014), and confirmatory factor analysis of its items has affirmed its use as a general self-efficacy measure (Dou, 2017). Nevertheless, we present this as a possible limitation of our study.…”
Section: Physics Self-efficacymentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With regard to the SOSESC-P, past studies have set precedence for reliably using this instrument to measure overall self-efficacy in introductory physics contexts (e.g. Fencl & Scheel, 2004;Trujillo & Tanner, 2014), and confirmatory factor analysis of its items has affirmed its use as a general self-efficacy measure (Dou, 2017). Nevertheless, we present this as a possible limitation of our study.…”
Section: Physics Self-efficacymentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Much of this manuscript is based on the first author's Ph.D. thesis whose development was supported by the coauthors (Dou, 2017). We would like to thank the discipline-based education researchers associated with the STEM Transformation Institute led by Dr. Laird Kramer at Florida International University.…”
Section: Acknowledgementsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This interpretation assumes that the student is exercising agency in their interactions, listing peers they purposefully sought after. Overall trends in network data from this and similar physics classrooms suggest this to be the case [54,55]. The other possible interpretation does not necessarily imply a form of student agency, but rather considers student perception instead.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%