1974
DOI: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)60939-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Interactions of Lectins with Animal Cell Surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
176
1
5

Year Published

1975
1975
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 921 publications
(193 citation statements)
references
References 510 publications
9
176
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent observations by have led to the hypothesis that the agglutinability of cells is regulated through the modulation of cell surface microvilli by cAMP, and that cAMP decreases agglutinability by decreasing the formation of microvilli and altering the intracellular distribution of microfilaments and microtubules. Others have been unable to confirm these findings, and have suggested that the presence or absence of microvilli alone does not explain differences in agglutinability (4,18). The proposal that transformed cells are highly agglutinable because their low cAMP levels result in the formation of numerous surface microvilli is not supported by our data.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 86%
“…Recent observations by have led to the hypothesis that the agglutinability of cells is regulated through the modulation of cell surface microvilli by cAMP, and that cAMP decreases agglutinability by decreasing the formation of microvilli and altering the intracellular distribution of microfilaments and microtubules. Others have been unable to confirm these findings, and have suggested that the presence or absence of microvilli alone does not explain differences in agglutinability (4,18). The proposal that transformed cells are highly agglutinable because their low cAMP levels result in the formation of numerous surface microvilli is not supported by our data.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 86%
“…However, the use of Con A as a label for the presence of plasma membrane fragments in subcellular fractions depends on the distribution of Con A receptor sites on the plasma membrane and on the exclusive binding of Con A to the plasma membrane. The distribution pattern of Con A receptor sites on cell surfaces has been shown to depend on several factors such as cell type, state of differentiation, reaction time with Con A and temperature (Smith & Revel, 1972;Nicolson, 1974;Graham et al, 1974;Burgess & Linstead, 1976;Williamson et al, 1976). The results presented in this paper showed that under the conditions used the Con A receptor sites on the protoplasts of Schizophyllum commune visualized by the HRP labelling technique (Bernhard & Avrameas, 1971) were randomly distributed on the protoplast surface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Thus the Con Adnduced isoagglutination between gametes of the same mating type entails an interaction between flagellar tips which presumably involves surface carbohydrates (13) and which cannot be distinguished morphologically from true mating (27), but we demonstrate that this interaction fails to induce either cell wall lysis or mating structure activation. Therefore, assuming that the lectin is not itself inhibiting any stages in the lytic and/or activation processes, these experiments indicate that the gamete is somehow able to discriminate between specific and nonspecific perturbations of its flagellar surface.…”
Section: Membranes and Cellsmentioning
confidence: 56%