The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1984
DOI: 10.1016/0301-4622(84)87006-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The interactions between nucleic acids and polyamines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is likely caused by the higher buffer capacity provided by the six aminog roups of ON8,w hich likely are fully protonated at the experimental pH value of 7.0. [45] The same relationb etween duplex stabilization and salt concentration was observed for the two reference strands ON1 and ON2.T his was expected, as the pK a value of the 2'-amino group in 2'-amino-LNA-Th as been reported to be 6.17. [46] Binding specificity was assessed for ON3, ON4 and ON5 in comparison with ON1 with the nucleobase complementary to the site of modification on the opposite strandsb eing varied from adenosine to guanine, cytosine or thymine/uracil centrally (Table S3 in the SupportingI nformation).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…This is likely caused by the higher buffer capacity provided by the six aminog roups of ON8,w hich likely are fully protonated at the experimental pH value of 7.0. [45] The same relationb etween duplex stabilization and salt concentration was observed for the two reference strands ON1 and ON2.T his was expected, as the pK a value of the 2'-amino group in 2'-amino-LNA-Th as been reported to be 6.17. [46] Binding specificity was assessed for ON3, ON4 and ON5 in comparison with ON1 with the nucleobase complementary to the site of modification on the opposite strandsb eing varied from adenosine to guanine, cytosine or thymine/uracil centrally (Table S3 in the SupportingI nformation).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Protonation fractions as a function of pH have been determined for ethylenediamine, trien 8, and tetren 9 by 1 H [106] and 13 C NMR [152], for 3,2,3-tet and 3,3,3-tet (for nomenclature, see ref. [151]) by 13 C NMR [155], for spermine (10) and spermidine (11) by 1 H [156] and 13 C NMR [153,154], for thermospermine by 15 N NMR [157] and for the neuroactive wasp toxin philanthotoxin-343 by 1 H and 13 C NMR titration [158]. Microconstants have been determined by NMR titration for N-(2-mercaptoethyl)-1,3-diaminopropane [159], tetren [27], spermine, spermidine, and homologues [154,160].…”
Section: Open-chain Polyaminesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The charge distribution is clearly important for molecular recognition, but also the hydrophobic polymethylene backbone confers structural flexibility and the possibility of important secondary binding interactions. There are multiple parallel protonation pathways for the basic centres of the partially protonated species which may account for many of the biochemical functions of these molecules [16]. DNA condensation is dependent upon three characteristic properties of natural or synthetic polyamines: firstly, the number of positive charges which therefore influence the local ionic strength [17,18]; secondly, the regiochemical distribution of these charges whose p K a s are intimately dependent upon their cooperativity [16,18,19]; thirdly, the local salt concentration [4,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are multiple parallel protonation pathways for the basic centres of the partially protonated species which may account for many of the biochemical functions of these molecules [16]. DNA condensation is dependent upon three characteristic properties of natural or synthetic polyamines: firstly, the number of positive charges which therefore influence the local ionic strength [17,18]; secondly, the regiochemical distribution of these charges whose p K a s are intimately dependent upon their cooperativity [16,18,19]; thirdly, the local salt concentration [4,18]. Although Wilson and Bloomfield [4] predict, using Manning's polyelectrolyte theory [20], that condensation will occur when the polyamine:DNA charge ratio approaches 1:1 (when typically ∼90% of the DNA polyanionic charge has been neutralised), in practice, the off‐rate of binding of simple polyamines is so large as to require a several‐fold charge excess of polyamine to DNA (polyammonium ions to phosphate) in order to effect efficient condensation of DNA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%