2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijer.2013.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The interactional structure of explanations during shared reading at kindergarten

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, in the reminiscing literature, some caregivers are shown to use an elaborative style (characterized in part by questions and follow ups that extend the conversation) when talking about the past with their young children, which is shown to predict language development (e.g., Reese, Leyva, Sparks & Grolnick, 2010; for a review see Salmon & Reese, 2016). Explanatory talk during readalouds in kindergarten classrooms is also shown to involve discussions over multiple speaker turns (Gosen, Berenst & de Glopper, 2013; Mascareño, Snow, Deunk & Bosker, 2016), and preschool teachers’ child-involved analytic talk is more predictive of children’s vocabulary growth than other features of the talk, such as immediate recall and feedback (Dickinson & Smith, 1994). From a social-interactionist view (Peterson & McCabe, 1994; Vygotsky, 1978), such talk is likely to benefit the child’s developing language skills not only because of the abstract/concrete content of individual utterances, but also and perhaps more importantly because of its interactive and co-constructive nature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, in the reminiscing literature, some caregivers are shown to use an elaborative style (characterized in part by questions and follow ups that extend the conversation) when talking about the past with their young children, which is shown to predict language development (e.g., Reese, Leyva, Sparks & Grolnick, 2010; for a review see Salmon & Reese, 2016). Explanatory talk during readalouds in kindergarten classrooms is also shown to involve discussions over multiple speaker turns (Gosen, Berenst & de Glopper, 2013; Mascareño, Snow, Deunk & Bosker, 2016), and preschool teachers’ child-involved analytic talk is more predictive of children’s vocabulary growth than other features of the talk, such as immediate recall and feedback (Dickinson & Smith, 1994). From a social-interactionist view (Peterson & McCabe, 1994; Vygotsky, 1978), such talk is likely to benefit the child’s developing language skills not only because of the abstract/concrete content of individual utterances, but also and perhaps more importantly because of its interactive and co-constructive nature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teachers need to help students develop the mindsets required for creativity (Starko, 2013). Part of this is helping students gain content knowledge (Gregory, Hardiman, Yarmonlinskaya, Rinne, & Limb, 2013). This should include how to visualize and how to get in the habit of noticing (Garner, 2013), as well as how to ponder the ramifications of their solutions (Gregory et al, 2013) while thinking in an interdisciplinary manner with creativity (Starko, 2013).…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Part of this is helping students gain content knowledge (Gregory, Hardiman, Yarmonlinskaya, Rinne, & Limb, 2013). This should include how to visualize and how to get in the habit of noticing (Garner, 2013), as well as how to ponder the ramifications of their solutions (Gregory et al, 2013) while thinking in an interdisciplinary manner with creativity (Starko, 2013). Teachers also need to help students develop the skills required for creativity (Starko, 2013).…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, Rick self-selects and spontaneously comes up with a possible explanation as to why the towers look so small, which he illustrates by aligning gestures. His contribution takes a typical form (indicated by the box around it in this and following excerpts) that regularly occurs with discussion contributions (Gosen, Berenst and de Glopper 2013; these contributions typically contain a causal conjunction). In this case, the conjunction because is preceded by yes, which signals the relation with the previous contribution.…”
Section: Speaker Transcriptmentioning
confidence: 99%