1990
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-74859-2_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Interactional Context of Deaf Mother-Infant Communication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
31
0
3

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
31
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Usually, reciprocal interaction routines are created because mothers apply intentions to their babies' behaviors, approaching them as conversation turns (Dunham & Dunham, 1995;Kaye & Charney, 1981;Meltzoff & Gopnik, 1993;Messer, 1994;Snow, 1979). Deaf mothers of deaf children assign intentions more to nonverbal behaviors with more pronounced nonverbal reactions, such as more body language, gesture, positive facial expression, and smiling (Erting, Prezioso, & O'Grady Hynes, 1990;Harris, 2001;Koester, 1992Koester, , 1995Koester, Brooks, & Karkowski, 1998;Koester et al, 2000;Maestas y Moores, 1980;Meadow-Orlans, MacTurk, Prezioso, Erting, & Day, 1987;Reilly & Bellugi, 1996;Smith-Gray & Koester, 1995).…”
Section: The Early Use Of Visual-tactile Communication Strategies By mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Usually, reciprocal interaction routines are created because mothers apply intentions to their babies' behaviors, approaching them as conversation turns (Dunham & Dunham, 1995;Kaye & Charney, 1981;Meltzoff & Gopnik, 1993;Messer, 1994;Snow, 1979). Deaf mothers of deaf children assign intentions more to nonverbal behaviors with more pronounced nonverbal reactions, such as more body language, gesture, positive facial expression, and smiling (Erting, Prezioso, & O'Grady Hynes, 1990;Harris, 2001;Koester, 1992Koester, , 1995Koester, Brooks, & Karkowski, 1998;Koester et al, 2000;Maestas y Moores, 1980;Meadow-Orlans, MacTurk, Prezioso, Erting, & Day, 1987;Reilly & Bellugi, 1996;Smith-Gray & Koester, 1995).…”
Section: The Early Use Of Visual-tactile Communication Strategies By mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deaf mothers of deaf infants are likely to respect their infants looking away at something else in the surrounding by waiting for the child's attention without intervening and comment about the child's immediately preceding attention when he or she looks back at her (Erting et al, 1990;Harris, 2000Harris, , 2001Jamieson, 1994a;Koester et al, 1998;Smith-Gray & Koester, 1995;Spencer & Gutfreund, 1993;Spencer et al, 1992). This sequential timing of language input seems to be an adjustment to the children's need to get both environmental and linguistic information through the visual channel and increases the likelihood that the expressed intentions are perceived (Swisher, 1991(Swisher, , 1992(Swisher, , 2000.…”
Section: The Early Use Of Visual-tactile Communication Strategies By mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assim, as experiências lingüísticas da criança surda, exposta à língua de sinais desde o seu nascimento e processadas, portanto, na modalidade espaço-visual, podem ser comparadas à aquisição das línguas orais. De fato, inúmeras pesquisas evidenciam que, o contexto lingüístico no qual a criança surda está inserida, influencia diretamente sua aquisição da linguagem, do mesmo modo como ocorre com a criança ouvinte (ver, por exemplo, Bellugi, O´Grady, & LilloMartin, 2002;Boyes Braem, 2002;Erting, Prezioso, & O'Gragy Hynes, 2002;Pettito, 2002;Pizzuto, 2002e Reilly, McIntire, & Bellugi, 2002. Mais especificamente, Erting et al (2002), defendem que, a criança surda quando exposta à língua de sinais desde o seu nascimento, participa de uma "cultura visual" como um primeiro meio de comunicação, que eles denominam de viso-gestual.…”
unclassified
“…De fato, inúmeras pesquisas evidenciam que, o contexto lingüístico no qual a criança surda está inserida, influencia diretamente sua aquisição da linguagem, do mesmo modo como ocorre com a criança ouvinte (ver, por exemplo, Bellugi, O´Grady, & LilloMartin, 2002;Boyes Braem, 2002;Erting, Prezioso, & O'Gragy Hynes, 2002;Pettito, 2002;Pizzuto, 2002e Reilly, McIntire, & Bellugi, 2002. Mais especificamente, Erting et al (2002), defendem que, a criança surda quando exposta à língua de sinais desde o seu nascimento, participa de uma "cultura visual" como um primeiro meio de comunicação, que eles denominam de viso-gestual. Esta interação favorece a atenção da criança para as atividades que ocorrem em seu campo visual, e para os sinais utilizados na interação mãe-bebê, o que favorece, por sua vez, uma interação mais ativa com o ambiente, além de estabelecer a socialização com base na linguagem viso-gestual, por meio de um processo de construção de esquemas comunicativos (Caselli, 2002).…”
unclassified
“…Another contributing factor is the issue of language access. Deaf and hard of hearing students do not receive necessary early access to a visual language, sign language (Easterbrooks & Baker, 2002;Andrews, Leigh, & Weiner, 2004;Chamberlain & Mayberry, 2000;Goldin-Meadow & Mayberry, 2001;Hoffmeister, 2000;Erting, Prezioso, O'Grady-Hynes, 1990;Anderson, 2006). Regardless of research that validates the needs of deaf and hard of hearing students, current schools and programs that serve deaf and hard of hearing students within a hearing continuum struggle to provide the necessary support for those students to transition to laterliteracy success (Mayer, 2007;Kyle & Harris, 2011).…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%