1998
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.1998.00194.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The interaction of soil biota and soil structure under global change

Abstract: The structural framework of soil mediates all soil processes, at all relevant scales. The spatio‐temporal heterogeneity prevalent in most soils underpins the majority of biological diversity in soil, providing refuge sites for prey against predator, flow paths for biota to move, or be moved, and localized pools of substrate for biota to multiply. Just as importantly, soil biota play a crucial role in mediating soil structure: bacteria and fungi aggregate and stabilize structure at small scales (μm–cm) and eart… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
59
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The direct effects of elevated atmospheric CO 2 on soil invertebrates are likely to be negligible because pCO 2 concentrations are typically 10-50 times higher in soils than in the atmosphere (3). High pCO 2 effects on vegetation, however, must indirectly affect soil biota because plant tissues and photosynthates form the base of the soil food web (36). Studies show that elevated pCO 2 levels (twice current levels of Ϸ350 ppm by volume) increase photosynthesis, reduce nitrogen and Rubisco concentrations (an enzyme regulating carbon fixation), and substantially decrease the nutritional value of plant tissue resulting in slower growth rates, incomplete development, and increased mortality in some her- *(A) Results of two-way ANOVAs evaluating trace-fossil diameters with respect to the PETM, grain size of host deposits, and the combination of these two factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The direct effects of elevated atmospheric CO 2 on soil invertebrates are likely to be negligible because pCO 2 concentrations are typically 10-50 times higher in soils than in the atmosphere (3). High pCO 2 effects on vegetation, however, must indirectly affect soil biota because plant tissues and photosynthates form the base of the soil food web (36). Studies show that elevated pCO 2 levels (twice current levels of Ϸ350 ppm by volume) increase photosynthesis, reduce nitrogen and Rubisco concentrations (an enzyme regulating carbon fixation), and substantially decrease the nutritional value of plant tissue resulting in slower growth rates, incomplete development, and increased mortality in some her- *(A) Results of two-way ANOVAs evaluating trace-fossil diameters with respect to the PETM, grain size of host deposits, and the combination of these two factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EPS), which can affect soil binding and adhesion (soil aggregation) directly or indirectly via microbial activity; and water uptake, which affects slaking (Materechera et al 1994;Angers and Caron 1998;Pierret et al 2011). Such processes result in general packing effects around the roots (Clemente et al 2005), which are involved in the formation of macropores (Young et al 1998), especially when deeprooted species are grown. Multiple-crop systems can incorporate a range of differing root networks and structures, generally increasing depths and overall rootlength densities, compared to sole crops.…”
Section: Kinetic Restructuringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In ISBA, k sat depends only on soil texture (through the empirical equations of Clapp and Hornberger, 1978). As texture is constant with depth, ISBA does not consider the changes in hydraulic conductivity produced by structural causes, for example, the presence of macropores (which are produced by such agents as plant roots, soil cracks, or soil fauna Young et al, 1998). Therefore, the lack of representation of the structure of the soil, leads to a k sat that does not depend on depth and, therefore, to a non adequate C 3 .…”
Section: Introducing a Parameterization For Hydraulic Conductivity Inmentioning
confidence: 99%