1976
DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1976.tb134448.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

THE INTERACTION OF ETHANOL AND $Δ 9 ‐TETRAHYDROCANNABINOL IN MAN EFFECTS ON PERCEPTUAL, COGNITIVE AND MOTOR FUNCTIONS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ethanol doses of 0.1 and 0.2g/kg produced peak BAC levels of 0.02 and 0.04% at 10min, respectively, and this was not different in the conditions when participants were pretreated with THC. This lack of effect of THC on BAC is in agreement with several studies (Belgrave et al, 1979; Bird et al, 1980; Chait and Perry, 1994; Hansteen et al, 1976; Manno et al, 1971; Perez-Reyes et al, 1988) but not consistent with others which found that smoked cannabis can potentiate BAC (Adams et al, 1978; Chesher et al, 1976). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ethanol doses of 0.1 and 0.2g/kg produced peak BAC levels of 0.02 and 0.04% at 10min, respectively, and this was not different in the conditions when participants were pretreated with THC. This lack of effect of THC on BAC is in agreement with several studies (Belgrave et al, 1979; Bird et al, 1980; Chait and Perry, 1994; Hansteen et al, 1976; Manno et al, 1971; Perez-Reyes et al, 1988) but not consistent with others which found that smoked cannabis can potentiate BAC (Adams et al, 1978; Chesher et al, 1976). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In at least one study, ethanol increased plasma levels of THC after smoked cannabis (Lukas and Orozco, 2001), providing some evidence for a pharmacokinetic interaction. Additionally, two studies found that smoked cannabis increased blood alcohol concentrations (BACs) (Adams et al, 1978; Chesher et al, 1976), although other studies did not see this effect (Belgrave et al, 1979; Bird et al, 1980; Chait and Perry, 1994; Hansteen et al, 1976; Manno et al, 1971; Perez-Reyes et al, 1988). Pharmacodynamically, ethanol and THC act on some of the same neurotransmitter systems, such as the mesolimbic dopamine pathway (Boileau et al, 2003; Di Chiara and Imperato, 1988; Diana et al, 1998; Gessa et al, 1998; Tanda et al, 1997; Weiss et al, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Available studies indicate the most common form of simultaneous drug use involves alcohol and marijuana (Collins et al, 1998; Earleywine and Newcomb, 1997; Martin et al, 1996; Midanik et al, 2007; SAMHSA, 2009). Consequences of simultaneous alcohol and marijuana (SAM) use include additive effects on a variety of cognitive, perceptual and motor functions, with clearly increased risk for behaviors such as driving (Belgrave et al, 1979; Chesher et al, 1976, 1977; Kelly et al, 2004; Lamers and Ramaekers, 2001; Ramaekers et al, 2000; Robbe, 1998). SAM use has been significantly and positively associated with social consequences, alcohol dependence and depression, binge drinking, and other health problems (Brière et al, 2011; Martin et al, 1996; Midanik et al, 2007; SAMHSA 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among THC users, the drug combination was reported to have an ‘antagonistic’ effect, with the combination ameliorating the effect of THC alone at certain dose combinations. The results of subsequent studies have been equivocal with evidence of additive effects when EtOH is combined with low doses of THC [16] but no additive effect when EtOH was combined with higher doses of THC [17, 18]. Inconsistencies also characterize more recent studies of driving performance where the combination of THC and EtOH produced greater impairment than either drug alone [19, 20] on measures of psychomotor performance and simulated driving performance (e.g., speed, lane position, steering deviation) but not on measures of body sway, brake latency, and other driving related performance measures (e.g., speed, steering and headway maintenance [21, 22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%