Ecology and Management of Coppice Woodlands 1992
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-2362-4_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The interaction of deer and vegetation in coppice woods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the forest composition ratios used on our model were specifically chosen to represent habitat suitability indeces for A. flavicollis , the species mainly responsible of the non-viraemic transmission of TBE virus to ticks [54] , [55] , which is generally described as a species of mature forests with understory [56] , [57] . It is widely acknowledged that the structure and species composition of vegetation in the different horizontal layers within a woodland have a considerable influence on small mammals [57] , [58] , [59] , [60] , and the episodic and synchronous production of seeds (mast) which occurs in high stand forests, but very rarely in coppices, could also have a profound influence on these small rodent populations [61] , [62] , [63] , [64] , [but see 65] . It could be argued that increasing forest cover actually reflects an increase of the TBE-vector tick, I.ricinus , which also prefers woodland habitat with an understory that offers favourable microclimatic (especially humidity) conditions [66] ; however, while previous studies have shown that co-feeding of larvae and nymphs on rodent hosts, which is essential for TBE virus amplification, increases with tick density, tick abundance only explains the focal distribution of TBE, but not TBE incidence [11] , [3] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the forest composition ratios used on our model were specifically chosen to represent habitat suitability indeces for A. flavicollis , the species mainly responsible of the non-viraemic transmission of TBE virus to ticks [54] , [55] , which is generally described as a species of mature forests with understory [56] , [57] . It is widely acknowledged that the structure and species composition of vegetation in the different horizontal layers within a woodland have a considerable influence on small mammals [57] , [58] , [59] , [60] , and the episodic and synchronous production of seeds (mast) which occurs in high stand forests, but very rarely in coppices, could also have a profound influence on these small rodent populations [61] , [62] , [63] , [64] , [but see 65] . It could be argued that increasing forest cover actually reflects an increase of the TBE-vector tick, I.ricinus , which also prefers woodland habitat with an understory that offers favourable microclimatic (especially humidity) conditions [66] ; however, while previous studies have shown that co-feeding of larvae and nymphs on rodent hosts, which is essential for TBE virus amplification, increases with tick density, tick abundance only explains the focal distribution of TBE, but not TBE incidence [11] , [3] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, this sylvicultural practice may be in conflict with the forest manage ment based on short rotation cycle that is intended to advantage other mammal (e.g. deer, see Ratcliffe, 1992) and bird species (e.g. nightingales, Bayes & Anderson, 1988 ;Fuller, 1992), even in many forests of the ltalian peninsula.…”
Section: Mus Domesticusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coppice can provide ideal conditions for deer, providing both dense cover and high quality browse (Ratcliffe, 1992;Fuller and Gill, 2001). Roe and muntjac cause the most widespread damage to coppice re-growth, though local impacts from fallow can be severe (Symonds, 1985;Tabor, 1993;Chapman et al, 1994;Cooke, 1994;Putman, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%