1983
DOI: 10.1016/0193-3973(83)90058-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The interaction of cognitive styles and classroom environment in determining first-graders' behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of behavioral scenarios were embedded in T1 to examine the child’s responses to structured situations and interpersonal interactions. One of these was the Stranger Task (see Trickett, 1983), which examined how participants responded to an informal interaction with an unfamiliar male interviewer (who was blind to abuse status) during an 8-min warmup procedure prior to the start of psychological testing (Negriff, Noll, Shenk, Putnam, & Trickett, 2010). The child was seated at the testing table and told she could draw a picture, color in a book, or read a magazine until the interviewer was ready to start.…”
Section: Techniques To Maintain and Engage Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of behavioral scenarios were embedded in T1 to examine the child’s responses to structured situations and interpersonal interactions. One of these was the Stranger Task (see Trickett, 1983), which examined how participants responded to an informal interaction with an unfamiliar male interviewer (who was blind to abuse status) during an 8-min warmup procedure prior to the start of psychological testing (Negriff, Noll, Shenk, Putnam, & Trickett, 2010). The child was seated at the testing table and told she could draw a picture, color in a book, or read a magazine until the interviewer was ready to start.…”
Section: Techniques To Maintain and Engage Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is general agreement that a teacher's managerial behaviour is pivotal in establishing a classroom environment that will be conducive to student learning. Further, teachers who provide clear and structured rules and encourage active student participation in the learning process achieve greater cognitive and affective gains for their pupils (Humphrey, 1984;Keyser & Barling, 1981), while at the same time minimise disruptive behaviours (Tricket, 1983).…”
Section: General Managerial Skillsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, one traditional test of organism-environment interaction typically involves comparison of environment development relations for males versus females (e.g., Bergman, 1981;Block, Block, & Morrison, 1981;Compas, 1987;Wachs, 1979). Other examples of this type of design include tests for differential reactivity for developmentally disabled versus normal children (e.g., Brice, 1985;Casto, 1987;Smith & Hagan, 1984); hyperactive versus normal children (e.g., Brimer & Levine, 1983;Magnusson, 1988); preterm versus normal children (Field, 1981) Kogan, 1983;Trickett, 1983); temperamentally easy versus temperamentally difficult children (e.g., Gordon, 1981;Maziade et al, 1985;Wachs & Gandour, 1983); introverted versus extraverted children (e.g., McCord & Wakefield, 1981); and highly reactive versus low reactive children (Strelau, 1983).…”
Section: Categorical Versus Continuous Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%