The interaction of city and basin: research on the transformation of historical cities in JinZhong Basin, ShanXi province, China

Zhang, Yan; Dong, Wei

doi:10.1080/13467581.2021.1972807

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 13 publications

(8 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Value factor is the key to evaluate historical and cultural heritage [18]. From the contemporary view towards conservation, the major issue is to conserve values [19].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Vitality evaluation of historical and cultural districts based on the values dimension: districts in Beijing City, China

Zhang

Han

2022

Herit Sci

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Historical and cultural districts are an important part of the urban heritage environment, reflecting the urban characteristics and carrying the core value of urban development. At present, most of the research on the vitality of historical and cultural districts mainly carries out quantitative evaluation from the two aspects of material space and time dimension, while the analysis on the value level is weakened, and the content of value type evaluation is also ignored. Value is the main factor affecting the vitality of historical and cultural districts, and it is also the core content to keep them alive. Therefore, this study takes nine historical and cultural districts of three types (cultural, commercial and residential) in Beijing, the capital of China, as examples to form a vitality evaluation framework with value as the evaluation goal, and select three indicators: historical value (including historical environment, cultural environment and spatial environment), use value (including communication environment, business environment and residential environment) and sustainable value (including educational environment, attraction and creativity), which correspond to the past, present and future of the heritage respectively. The literature summary method is used to get the evaluation content, the ranking analytic hierarchy process is used to determine the index weight, experts are invited to score, and the influence degree of each factor is comprehensively ranked and analyzed. Finally, it puts forward the evaluation system of historical and cultural districts. The framework can be used to collect expert opinions, conduct quantitative value evaluation, and adjust various indicators in practice before the protection strategy of historical and cultural districts is proposed. The results show that at present, Shichahai, Nanluoguxiang and Fuchengmennei have the highest vitality among the three types. The blocks that mainly embody cultural value have higher vitality than those that mainly embody commercial value and residential value.

show abstract

“…Value factor is the key to evaluate historical and cultural heritage [18]. From the contemporary view towards conservation, the major issue is to conserve values [19].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Vitality evaluation of historical and cultural districts based on the values dimension: districts in Beijing City, China

Zhang

Han

2022

Herit Sci

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

A model approach for post evaluation of adaptive reuse of architectural heritage: a case study of Beijing central axis historical buildings

Zhang

2023

Herit Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The adaptive reuse of architectural heritage is the basis of embodying its core value, bringing new life to heritage architecture, and is an important way to integrate it into contemporary development. In many current studies, the adaptive reuse of architectural heritage focuses on the research framework of adaptive reuse and the most effective method for adaptive reuse of a certain building. In the whole process, the post evaluation strategy of adaptive reuse based on specific cultural background is ignored, and the adaptive reuse of heritage buildings is a dynamic process. Therefore, this study takes 9 heritage sites along the central axis of Beijing (including three types of single buildings, architectural complexes, and historical and cultural district) as examples. The 25 factors affecting the adaptive reuse of architectural heritage are extracted by the literature retrieval method, and are divided into three categories according to the content: existing fabric, spatial character and policy and value. Then the analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation are used to calculate the factors of 9 heritage sites in matrix, and finally obtain the reuse score of each heritage site. The results show that Meridian Gate has the highest comprehensive score for reuse in single buildings, the Forbidden City has the highest score for reuse in building complex, and Qianmen Street has the highest score in historical and cultural district. This study provides post-evaluation methods and strategies for the adaptive reuse of architectural heritage. Finally, a post-evaluation framework for the adaptive reuse of architectural heritage is formed. Finally, a post-evaluation framework for the reuse of architectural heritage against a specific cultural background has been formed. In the future, the status of the reuse of architectural heritage can be evaluated to maintain its proper authenticity, integrity and sustainability at any time. It can also guide the relevant decision-making before the adaptive reuse of architectural heritage and the optimization process after the adaptive reuse of architectural heritage.

show abstract

The interaction of city and basin: research on the transformation of historical cities in JinZhong Basin, ShanXi province, China

Cited by 2 publications

References 13 publications

Vitality evaluation of historical and cultural districts based on the values dimension: districts in Beijing City, China

Vitality evaluation of historical and cultural districts based on the values dimension: districts in Beijing City, China

A model approach for post evaluation of adaptive reuse of architectural heritage: a case study of Beijing central axis historical buildings

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About