1993
DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(93)91473-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The interaction of atomic hydrogen with Cu(110)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As observed by Sun et al [7] and in good agreement with those results, the 2 eV peak, ascribed to surface state transitions in clean Cu(110), is found to decrease strongly nonlinearly at low coverages. The same feature is also observed in other systems [5,6,12,13] adsorbed on Cu(110). We also show that CO adsorption affects profoundly the dynamics of the optical transitions with respect to the clean surface in the whole RA spectrum (0-6 eV).…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As observed by Sun et al [7] and in good agreement with those results, the 2 eV peak, ascribed to surface state transitions in clean Cu(110), is found to decrease strongly nonlinearly at low coverages. The same feature is also observed in other systems [5,6,12,13] adsorbed on Cu(110). We also show that CO adsorption affects profoundly the dynamics of the optical transitions with respect to the clean surface in the whole RA spectrum (0-6 eV).…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…Experimental studies of 3-thyophene carboxilate [5] and 9-anthracene carboxylic acid [6] on Cu(110) show the evolution of the 2 eV RA peak upon coverage, from the clean surface to the p2 1, similar to that of CO=Cu110 described here. Previously, a very exhaustive photoemission study on H=Cu110 [13] showed that the progressive quenching of surface states intensity upon coverage is nonlinear, as proposed for CO=Cu110. On the other hand, Jin et al [10] observed a linear behavior in the RA evolution with coverage in different thermal conditions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…By analogy, we, too, assign the low temperature TDS peak to a subsurface H species. This assignment is supported by our inverse photoemis- sion data [14,15]: On Cu(l 10) the unoccupied Shockley surface state at the Y point of the surface Brillouin zone [15,16] survives up to 0\\ =0.45, but disappears completely as the population of the low temperature TDS state is increased. In contrast, on Ni(110) the unoccupied Shockley surface state [14] survives the adsorption of H2 at low temperatures up to H coverages of 0H = 1.5.…”
Section: Sticking Adsorption and Absorption Of Atomic H On Cu(110)mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The difference of the TDS spectra in the temperature range between 250 and 300 K is due to an irreversible phase transition, i.e., the missing/added row reconstruction taking place on H/Cu(l 10). This is discussed in more detail in [15] and references therein.…”
Section: Sticking Adsorption and Absorption Of Atomic H On Cu(110)mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Desorption of hydrogen from Cu surfaces occurs at a variety of temperatures depending on the surface termination. For example, hydrogen desorbs from Cu{1 1 1} below room temperature and has even been found to be stable in subsurface regions as well as desorb from Cu{1 1 0} at 330 K [37][38][39]. No desorption data are available for hydrogen on Cu{5 3 1} but the fact that it is significantly more atomically rough than Cu{1 1 0} suggests that the desorption temperature is higher than 330 K. For the example of oxygen on Pt{5 3 1}, the desorption temperatures for oxygen are approximately 15% higher than for Pt{1 1 0} [40], while similar increases are observed for CO and oxygen on Cu{5 3 1} [41].…”
Section: Xpsmentioning
confidence: 98%