2017
DOI: 10.1101/240598
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The interaction landscape between transcription factors and the nucleosome

Abstract: 16Nucleosomes cover most of the genome and are thought to be displaced by

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
75
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
12
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We show that, at least for some PFs, the answer is no. In accordance with earlier studies (Liu and Kraus, 2017;Zhu et al, 2018), our results demonstrate that Sox2's pioneer activity is regulated by both translational and rotational positioning of its cognate motif within the nucleosome. Dyadpositioned sites support prolonged Sox2 binding compared to end-positioned sites.…”
Section: Distinct Nucleosome Targeting Properties Of Pfssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We show that, at least for some PFs, the answer is no. In accordance with earlier studies (Liu and Kraus, 2017;Zhu et al, 2018), our results demonstrate that Sox2's pioneer activity is regulated by both translational and rotational positioning of its cognate motif within the nucleosome. Dyadpositioned sites support prolonged Sox2 binding compared to end-positioned sites.…”
Section: Distinct Nucleosome Targeting Properties Of Pfssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…A recent study showed that the Sox family TFs exhibit preferred binding around the nucleosome dyad region (Zhu et al, 2018). To dissect the single-molecule binding kinetics of Sox2 at the dyad, we placed the Sox2 binding motif at the center of the 601 NPS (nucleotide #72-78) and assembled a nucleosome substrate Nuc S-Dyad (Figure 2A).…”
Section: Sox2 Stably Engages With Binding Sites Near the Nucleosome Dyadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent survey of TFnucleosome binding properties was performed for many different classes of TFs revealing how the nucleosome modifies the orientation and position of the TF binding compared to free DNA. Moreover, many TFs analyzed were capable of inducing nucleosome dissociation upon binding 11 . In the case of Oct4, the canonical configuration known from the structures of Oct4 bound to free DNA 6 is incompatible with nucleosome binding because it involves binding of the POUS and POUHD on opposite sides of DNA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For most transcription factors nucleosome wrapping substantially inhibits association with DNA both by inhibiting association and enhancing dissociation [56,57]. However, for others, binding to nucleosomes is as efficient as naked DNA, and some even prefer nucleosomal DNA [58,59]. It is not fully clear how this is achieved mechanistically but it has recently been shown that this is due to decreased dissociation rates [60] and for some may include stabilizing contacts with the histones [61].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%