2019
DOI: 10.1111/caim.12304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The interaction effects of proactive personality and empowering leadership and close monitoring behaviour on creativity

Abstract: In today's hurried information-oriented business environment, it is crucial to examine under what conditions individuals may perform for creativity. Taking an interactional perspective, this study investigates how the interactions of proactive personality and empowering leadership or close monitoring behaviour may influence employee creativity in opposite directions. Data from 163 samples indicate that proactive personality promotes creativity, while close monitoring behaviour lowers creativity.Furthermore, th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
59
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
3
59
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, this study contributes to the integration of social identity theory and leadership literature , by illustrating that empowering and fair leaders are more effective in influencing bricolage when individuals are highly identified. While empowering leadership and interactional justice provide the resources (Shaw, Wild, & Colquitt, 2003;Zhang & Bartol, 2010) As analyzed in the theoretical background, extant research has focused on understanding how leadership affects creativity and innovation, highlighting in particular the positive role of the empowering, transformational aspects of leadership (Byrne et al, 2009;Chong & Ma, 2010;Kim, 2019), as well as starting to focus on a more ethical dimension of the supervisor-coworker relationship to favor innovation (Pasricha & Rao, 2018). The present study builds on this research to illustrate how autonomy, trust, cooperation, and fairness should be combined in order to understand bricolage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Third, this study contributes to the integration of social identity theory and leadership literature , by illustrating that empowering and fair leaders are more effective in influencing bricolage when individuals are highly identified. While empowering leadership and interactional justice provide the resources (Shaw, Wild, & Colquitt, 2003;Zhang & Bartol, 2010) As analyzed in the theoretical background, extant research has focused on understanding how leadership affects creativity and innovation, highlighting in particular the positive role of the empowering, transformational aspects of leadership (Byrne et al, 2009;Chong & Ma, 2010;Kim, 2019), as well as starting to focus on a more ethical dimension of the supervisor-coworker relationship to favor innovation (Pasricha & Rao, 2018). The present study builds on this research to illustrate how autonomy, trust, cooperation, and fairness should be combined in order to understand bricolage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As analyzed in the theoretical background, extant research has focused on understanding how leadership affects creativity and innovation, highlighting in particular the positive role of the empowering, transformational aspects of leadership (Byrne et al, 2009; Chong & Ma, 2010; Kim, 2019), as well as starting to focus on a more ethical dimension of the supervisor–coworker relationship to favor innovation (Pasricha & Rao, 2018). The present study builds on this research to illustrate how autonomy, trust, cooperation, and fairness should be combined in order to understand bricolage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Existing research investigates inhibitors of creativity and describes the importance of perceived barriers in addition to real barriers because perceptions influence behaviour (Groth & Peters, 1999). Other studies focus on different approaches to enhance creative abilities and outcomes, such as extrinsic incentives (e.g., Burroughs et al, 2011; Kachelmeier et al, 2019), gamification elements (e.g., Agogué et al, 2015; Zimmerling et al, 2019), leadership behaviour (e.g., Hughes et al, 2018; Kim, 2019), or creativity training (e.g., Burroughs et al, 2011; Valgeirsdottir & Onarheim, 2017). Furthermore, a substantial body of literature focuses on creativity techniques that are defined as specific sessions to facilitate the creative process by providing strategies and heuristics to develop new ideas (e.g., Herrmann & Felfe, 2014; Meinel & Voigt, 2017).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The creative process may be subdivided into several subprocesses: identification of F I G U R E 1 Digital influencer characteristics the problem; information search, in which the employee gathers and processes information to develop an understanding of the identified problem; and the generation of ideas. Proactivity and support from a supervisor are equally critical to the success of the creative process (Caniëls, 2019;Kim, 2019).…”
Section: The Creative Processmentioning
confidence: 99%