The interaction effect of government non-financial support and firm's regulatory compliance on firm innovativeness in Sub-Saharan Africa

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to assess the interaction effect of government non-financial support and firms' regulatory compliance on firms' innovativeness. Firms' regulatory compliance with environmental and safety issues has been suggested as one of the reasons why firms innovate. Such compliance provides legitimacy, improves reputation and corporate image, and enhances customer loyalty and competitive advantages, which influence firm innovativeness. However, regulatory compliance is costly and with limited resources, the role of government support is crucial as a moderator, to help firms become more compliant and influence their innovativeness.Design/methodology/approachThe study uses data from the World Bank Enterprise Innovation Survey for seven countries in Sub-Saharan Africa.FindingsRegulatory compliance has a positive and significant effect on firm innovativeness. Increased use of government non-financial support enhances the level of firm regulatory compliance and the effect of regulatory compliance on firm innovativeness.Originality/valueThe study contributes to the literature on compliance and firm innovativeness in Africa by showing how the positive effect of regulatory compliance on firm innovativeness is stronger when firms benefit from government non-financial support.

Investigating the crowding effect of FDI on domestic investments: Evidence from Bangladesh

“…From a policy perspective, the government may consider incentivizing foreign investors to collaborate with local firms through privileged treatment policies, such as joint ventures, aimed at promoting technological spillovers and knowledge transfers [ 68 ]. Financial and non-financial support mechanisms should be extended to domestic companies willing to engage in joint ventures with foreign investors, fostering a conducive environment for collaboration [ 69 , 70 ].…”

A new perspective for European SMEs’ innovative support analysis: Does non-financial support matter?

“…Njinyah, Asongu & Adeleye [ 14 ] indicate in their analysis of the moderating effect of non-financial government support on firm innovativeness that government support of training and R&D facilitates innovation through knowledge sharing and expert knowledge acquisition. Empirically, their research found government non-financial support to influence the innovativeness regulatory compliance of firm in Sub- Sahara Africa.…”

“…Our research addresses this gap in the EU context, a topic largely unexplored until now, as previous studies have mainly focused on different regions, such as sub-Sahara Africa and Vietnam see Refs. [ 5 , 14 ]. These scholars explored the government non-financial support for SMEs (in line with Nguyen et al [ 5 ]), including human capital development through training, scientific contributions, and fostering an entrepreneurial environment.…”

The Role of Government Assistance in Zhanjiang Holistic Tourism Branding

“…The government, in particular, can assist businesses in getting import licenses for technology and other IT infrastructure as well as provide the appropriate technical information and other support [18]. Government support for businesses can either make up for their limited resources or, when combined with their existing skills, give them a competitive advantage and promote innovation [21]. Overall, the government can offer the companies the technical data and other help they need and creates favorable enabling conditions for their development.…”