The interaction between HIV testing social norms and self-efficacy on HIV testing among Chinese men who have sex with men: results from an online cross-sectional study

Abstract

BackgroundIncreasing human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing is critical for HIV control. This study aimed to evaluate the interaction between social norms and self-efficacy on HIV testing among Chinese men who have sex with men (MSM).MethodsWe conducted an online survey in eight Chinese cities in Shandong and Guangdong Provinces in July 2016. We included participants who were born as a male, at least 16 years old, currently living in one of the designated cities, and had ever engaged in anal sex with a man. We collected information regarding socio-demographics, high-risk behaviors, and history of HIV and other STI testing. We coded sensitivity to social norms using six items asking participants about their perceived social norm regarding HIV testing. We coded HIV testing self-efficacy using a separate six-item scale. We interpreted higher mean scores as higher sensitivity to social norms and higher self-efficacy, respectively. We conducted logistic regressions to evaluate the interaction between self-efficacy and social norms on HIV testing.ResultsA total of 2105 men completed the survey. The mean age of the participants was 25.97 ± 6.42 years. Over four-fifths (85.9%) of participants were unmarried, 22.7% were students, and 64.6% at least had a college degree. 62.5 and 32.6% of participants ever and tested HIV in the last three months, respectively.With respect to uptake of HIV testing in the last three months, the adjusted odds ratio was 1.01(95% CI: 0.96–1.06) for higher sensitivity to social norms and 1.09 (95% CI: 1.05–1.14) for higher self-efficacy, with an interaction effect of 1.02 (95% CI: 1.01–1.03), respectively. With respect to uptake of lifetime HIV testing, the adjusted odds ratio was 1.03(95% CI: 0.99–1.07) for higher sensitivity to social norms and 1.15 (95% CI: 1.11–1.19) for higher self-efficacy, with an interaction effect of 1.02 (95% CI: 1.01–1.04), respectively.ConclusionsOur survey demonstrated that there is a significant association between the uptake of HIV testing with sensitivity to the social norm, higher self-efficacy, as well as the interaction between them. Tailored studies for improving HIV testing among MSM in China can combine these two interventions together.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12879-018-3454-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Changes in HIV Testing Utilization Among Chinese Men Who Have Sex With Men During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Shenzhen, China: An Observational Prospective Cohort Study

“…Social norms are social attitudes of approval or disapproval that are specific to what should be or should not be done in the context of health. Perceived social norm supporting HIV testing was a facilitator for MSM to take up HIV testing ( 22 ). MSM may value the opinions of their male sex partners or peers.…”

Exploring the Use of “Nudges” to Improve HIV and Other Sexually Transmitted Infection Testing Among Men Who Have Sex with Men

“…The framing of reminder messages was categorized into (1) neutrally framed, (2) personalized, (3) positively framed, (4) negatively framed, and (5) social norms. The framing of messages was populated based on previous research on message framing in health communication (Camenga et al, 2014;Farrow et al, 2017;Kiene et al, 2005;Levin et al, 1998;Martin-Smith et al, 2018;Neuberger & Pabian, 2019;Perry et al, 2015;Yamin et al, 2019;Zhao et al, 2018).…”

“…Although we know from behavioral economics that under many circumstances, message framing (i.e., what words are used) and the message medium (i.e., how it is delivered) can influence behavioral outcomes (Farrow et al, 2017;Levin et al, 1998;Martin-Smith et al, 2018;Neuberger & Pabian, 2019;Zhao et al, 2018), few studies have explored the effects of message framing in the sexual health field. These studies have found that message framing impacted sexual decisionmaking and risk behavior (Camenga et al, 2014;Garcia-Retamero & Galesic, 2010;Kiene et al, 2005).…”

How Do Social Network Sites Influence Workout Intentions: A Social Norm Approach

“… Jang et al (2013) found that self-efficacy in resisting alcohol consumption moderated the effect of perceived descriptive drinking norm on both drinking intention and behavior such that the normative influences were stronger among those reporting a low level of refusal self-efficacy. Zhao et al (2018) revealed that self-efficacy in HIV testing moderated the effect of perceived social norm on HIV testing in the past 3 months and in lifetime such that self-efficacy enhanced the normative influence. Although Zhao et al (2018) did not specify the type of perceived social norm in their study, their measure of this variable is consistent with the conceptualization of perceived descriptive norm.…”

“… Zhao et al (2018) revealed that self-efficacy in HIV testing moderated the effect of perceived social norm on HIV testing in the past 3 months and in lifetime such that self-efficacy enhanced the normative influence. Although Zhao et al (2018) did not specify the type of perceived social norm in their study, their measure of this variable is consistent with the conceptualization of perceived descriptive norm. Therefore, similar to research suggesting that perceived injunctive norm enhanced the effect of perceived descriptive norm on the target behavior ( Lee et al, 2007 ; Göckeritz et al, 2010 ; Pandon et al, 2016 ), these studies also suggest that individuals may not follow perceived descriptive norms blindly.…”