2006
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The intensity contrast of solar photospheric faculae and network elements

Abstract: We studied the radiative properties of small magnetic elements (active region faculae and the network) during the rising phase of solar cycle 23 from 1996 to 2001, determining their contrasts as a function of heliocentric angle, magnetogram signal, and the solar cycle phase. We combined near-simultaneous full disk images of the line-of-sight magnetic field and photospheric continuum intensity provided by the MDI instrument on board the SOHO spacecraft. Sorting the magnetogram signal into different ranges allow… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
59
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(46 reference statements)
13
59
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, this is the only strong evidence for a dependence of local properties of the magnetic features on the global cycle. E.g., the facular contrast does not depend on solar cycle phase (Ortiz et al 2006). Secondly, such a confirmation appears timely in the light of the recent paper by Norton & Gilman (2004), who reported a smooth decrease in umbral brightness from early to mid phase in solar cycle 23, reaching a minimum intensity around solar maximum, after which the umbral brightness increased again, based on the analysis of more than 650 sunspots observed with the MDI instrument.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Firstly, this is the only strong evidence for a dependence of local properties of the magnetic features on the global cycle. E.g., the facular contrast does not depend on solar cycle phase (Ortiz et al 2006). Secondly, such a confirmation appears timely in the light of the recent paper by Norton & Gilman (2004), who reported a smooth decrease in umbral brightness from early to mid phase in solar cycle 23, reaching a minimum intensity around solar maximum, after which the umbral brightness increased again, based on the analysis of more than 650 sunspots observed with the MDI instrument.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…We find that at low magnetic flux the contrast first decreases with increasing flux before it starts increasing at higher average field strength (see Sect. 4), which is not observed at lower resolution (e.g., Ortiz et al 2006). The initial decrease is due to the fact that the magnetic field has a tendency to live in intergranular lanes.…”
Section: Modeling Magnetic Brightening In the Quiet Sunmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…3.2) requires the inclusion of a field component that does not contribute to brightness. At lower resolution, such as the MDI observations used by Ortiz et al (2006), the fishhook feature becomes too indistinct to be used in this way.…”
Section: Intrinsically Weak Magnetic Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent photometric imaging supports this correlation for the small magnetic elements of the quiet network, but shows that the contrast of larger plage elements in active network and active region plage is negative near disk center, positive near the limb, and vanishes at intermediate heliocentric angle (e.g., Moran et al 1992;Zirin & Wang 1992;Lawrence et al 1993;Topka et al 1997;Sobotka et al 2000;Ortiz et al 2006). In fact, plage area measurements include even pores and spots that are dark at all heliocentric angles (W. Marquette 1992, private communication; Tlatov et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%