2019
DOI: 10.3386/w26483
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Intellectual Spoils of War? Defense R&D, Productivity and International Spillovers

Abstract: In the US and many other OECD countries, expenditures for defense-related R&D represent a key policy channel through which governments shape innovation, and dwarf all other public subsidies for innovation. We examine the impact of government funding for R&D-and defense-related R&D in particular-on privately conducted R&D, and its ultimate effect on productivity growth. We estimate models that relate privately funded R&D to lagged government-funded R&D using industry-country level data from OECD countries and f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
63
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
5
63
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Azoulay et al (2019a) exploit quasi-experimental variation in funding from the National Institutes of Health across research areas to show that a $10 million increase in NIH funding to academics leads to 2.7 additional patents filed by private firms. Second, private firms themselves sometimes conduct publicly funded R&D. Moretti et al (2019) use changes in military R&D spending, which is frequently driven by exogenous political changes, to look at the effect of public subsidies for military R&D. They document that a 10 percent increase in publicly funded R&D to private firms results in a 3 percent increase in private R&D, suggesting that public R&D crowds in private R&D (and also, they document, raises productivity growth).…”
Section: Government Research Grantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Azoulay et al (2019a) exploit quasi-experimental variation in funding from the National Institutes of Health across research areas to show that a $10 million increase in NIH funding to academics leads to 2.7 additional patents filed by private firms. Second, private firms themselves sometimes conduct publicly funded R&D. Moretti et al (2019) use changes in military R&D spending, which is frequently driven by exogenous political changes, to look at the effect of public subsidies for military R&D. They document that a 10 percent increase in publicly funded R&D to private firms results in a 3 percent increase in private R&D, suggesting that public R&D crowds in private R&D (and also, they document, raises productivity growth).…”
Section: Government Research Grantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, as discussed below, our paper goes beyond previous work trying to assess the causal impact of public funding (Blume-Kohout 2012, Toole 2007, Jaffe 1986, Adams 1990) by using plausibly exogenous sources of variation in funding. (To our knowledge the only paper to do this previously is Moretti et al [2014]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1 Adams (1990) uses distributed lags and panel data to shed light on the effect of scientific knowledge stocks on productivity growth at the industry level. Moretti, Steinwender, and Van Reenen (2014) use shocks to defense R&D induced by the end of the cold war to identify the impact of government expenditures on TFP growth, once again at the industry level. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9. Moretti, Steinwender and Van Reene (2019) estimate the impacts of public funding R&D -specifically defense R&D -both on private R&D and on productivity. The paper corroborates the occurrence of very positive spillover effects and the key role of innovation policies on economic growth.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%