2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2265.2008.00467.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Integrity of Discourse in the Anglican Eucharistic Tradition: A Consideration of Philosophical Assumptions

Abstract: This article explores the integrity of the discourse in the Anglican eucharistic tradition by considering the philosophical assumptions that underlie eucharistic theology. It argues that where the conversation of the Anglican eucharistic tradition is open and unfinished then the integrity of the discourse is facilitated as opposed to the conversations of party positions and particular interests which suggest exclusive versions of truth. The conversation or dialogue of Anglican eucharistic theology is seen to b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main distinction between analyses in the discourse of Anglican eucharistic theology, in terms of philosophical assumptions, appears to be between moderate realism and nominalism. 129 The lack of acceptance by Anglican theologians of the relational or immoderate realist position is mirrored by theologians in the Roman Catholic tradition who also opt for moderate realism in their discussion of the Eucharist. Aquinas argues in this way, 130 as does The Catechism of the Catholic Church, which cites Aquinas and states that the body and blood of Christ 'cannot be apprehended by the senses .…”
Section: Pusey and Eucharistic Theologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main distinction between analyses in the discourse of Anglican eucharistic theology, in terms of philosophical assumptions, appears to be between moderate realism and nominalism. 129 The lack of acceptance by Anglican theologians of the relational or immoderate realist position is mirrored by theologians in the Roman Catholic tradition who also opt for moderate realism in their discussion of the Eucharist. Aquinas argues in this way, 130 as does The Catechism of the Catholic Church, which cites Aquinas and states that the body and blood of Christ 'cannot be apprehended by the senses .…”
Section: Pusey and Eucharistic Theologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This view has been referred to as ‘immoderate realism’ by Douglas. See also his very helpful historical survey of theologies of the Eucharist in the Anglican tradition at: http://anglicaneucharistictheology.com/Anglican_Eucharistic_Theology/Welcome.html…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%