2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The integration of peri-implant soft tissues around zirconia abutments: Challenges and strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 175 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, a recent review advocates for metal free and aesthetic zirconia abutments with different surface modification for soft tissue attachment over Ti and its alloys. 130 On the other hand, biological coatings are potent with cell/tissue adhesive properties, but they are costineffective as they are prone to proteolytic degradation by the action of matrix metalloproteases (MMPs). Clearly, there is no ideal coating that can glue the skin to transcutaneous metallic prostheses.…”
Section: Surface Coatings For Soft Tissue Attachmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, a recent review advocates for metal free and aesthetic zirconia abutments with different surface modification for soft tissue attachment over Ti and its alloys. 130 On the other hand, biological coatings are potent with cell/tissue adhesive properties, but they are costineffective as they are prone to proteolytic degradation by the action of matrix metalloproteases (MMPs). Clearly, there is no ideal coating that can glue the skin to transcutaneous metallic prostheses.…”
Section: Surface Coatings For Soft Tissue Attachmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alumina and zirconia are inert bioceramics that trigger minimal peri-implant inflammation, but they do not actively promote soft tissue interactions at the skin–implant interface. Nevertheless, a recent review advocates for metal free and aesthetic zirconia abutments with different surface modification for soft tissue attachment over Ti and its alloys . On the other hand, biological coatings are potent with cell/tissue adhesive properties, but they are cost-ineffective as they are prone to proteolytic degradation by the action of matrix metalloproteases (MMPs).…”
Section: Hard and Soft Tissue Integration Around Percutaneous Bone-an...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the use of zirconia abutments in clinical practice had significantly increased. Zirconia has mechanical properties comparable to titanium, fully supporting the masticatory function of restorations in the mouth [ 10 ]; Compared to traditional titanium abutments, zirconia abutments have superior aesthetic performance, significantly reducing the risk of gingival translucency in anterior dental implants [ 11 ]; Zirconia abutments are also known for their bacterial resistance, with a biologically inert surface that is less prone to bacterial attachment compared to titanium, reducing the risk of infection in the surrounding tissues [ 12 ]. However, the biologically inert surface of zirconia also affects its integration with the surrounding soft tissues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33,80 The trans-gingival site of the implant communicates with the oral cavity and is directly subjected to the invasion of bacteria. 81 Good connective tissue sealing can effectively maintain the stability of the 82,83 Once tissue inflammation and hyperplasia occur at the trans-gingival site, gingival edema occurs, the epithelium grows excessively into the gingival sulcus, and the peri-implant gingival sealing is destroyed. 81 Therefore, it is most important to inspect the inflammatory response and capsulation of connective tissue around nanostructured TLM abutments with Ag PIII treatment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%