The integration of open access journals in the scholarly communication system: Three science fields

Frandsen, Tove Faber

doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2008.06.001

Cited by 35 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…However, contrary to expectations, there was also no diminishing effect of OA status on sales. Frandsen (75) found no clear tendency towards an increase in impact of open availability. Conversely, articles in high-impact journals do show a clear tendency for citation impact to increase.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 93%

“…The author's sample employed 4,205 articles (385 OA articles and 3,820 non-OA articles). Frandsen (75) and Mueller-Langer (76) compared the OACA of papers in the repositories from the economics. Their study involved 1,329 articles (208 OA articles and 1,121 non-OA articles) in 15 journals and gathered the pre-prints from SSRN (Social Science Research Network) and RePEc.…”

Section: Citation Counts Of Selfarchived Articles (N = 15)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The impact of open access on the medical literature: a review of current literature

Turk¹

2017

SlovMedJour

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IzvlečekIzhodišča: Namen članka je podati pregled vpliva odprtega dostopa na znanstvene objave v medicini glede na tri kategorije: citiranost, vidnost in omembe v socialnih medijih.Metode: Podatke smo pridobili z iskalno strategijo, ki je vsebovala ključne besede, kot so "open access", "citation impact", "citation advantage", "citations count", "article download", "article usage", "social media attention" in "altmetrics".Rezultati: Z iskalno strategijo, ki smo jo uporabili v treh zbirkah podatkov, smo pridobili stosedem člankov, primernih za analizo. V sedeminšestdesetih člankih izmed teh se uporablja enostavna metodologija štetja citatov odprtodostopnih člankov in člankov iz naročniških revij, v devetnajst člankih se primerja število citatov in vpogledov, v enaindvajsetih člankih se raziskujejo omembe v socialnih medijih. Od tega je petindvajset člankov medicinskih, v katerih se obravnava vpliv vseh navedenih kategorij.Zaključki: V sedeminšestdesetih člankih izmed teh se uporablja enostavna metodologija štetja citatov odprtodostopnih člankov in člankov iz naročniških revij, v devetnajst člankih se primerja število citatov in vpogledov, v enaindvajsetih člankih se raziskujejo omembe v socialnih medijih. Od tega je petindvajset člankov medicinskih, v katerih se obravnava vpliv vseh navedenih kategorij. AbstractBackground: The aim of the article is to conduct an overview of the impact of OA on the medical articles based on 3-part categorization.Methods: Data were identified by a search strategy with eight combinations of keywords (open access, citation impact, citation advantage, citation count, article download, article usage, social media attention, altmetrics) and searched in three different databases. Results:The analysis was conducted on 107 studies dealing with citations, downloads and social impact. Sixty-seven of them simply employed the counting citations to OA and non-OA articles; nineteen articles compared the downloads and citations counts; and twenty-one articles investigated the social impact of OA articles. Twenty-five articles investigated the citations, download counts, and social impact of medical articles. Conclusions:The studies investigating the citation impact mostly showed citation advantages. Those that employed citation and download counts of medical articles using randomized controlled trials showed that OA articles were downloaded significantly more frequently, but found no evidence

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 93%

Section: Citation Counts Of Selfarchived Articles (N = 15)mentioning

confidence: 99%

The impact of open access on the medical literature: a review of current literature

Turk¹

2017

SlovMedJour

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[6] found that open access articles are more frequently cited in their early stages as compared with non-open access articles and pointed out the difference in the timing of the citation. [7] investigated the impact of open access on citations in three fields (biology, mathematics, and pharmacy and pharmacology) using regression analysis and found that the impacts are different among varying fields of science.…”

Section: Related Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

Open Access Determinants and the Effect on Article Performance

Asai¹

2017

IJBER

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…However, there is no general consensus on the intensity of that increase (UNESCO, 2012;OpCit Project, 2012;McCabe and Snyder, 2014). Although a minority, some other studies did not show any citation advantage (see for example Davis et al, 2008;Fradsen, 2009;Lansingh and Carter, 2009). …”

Section: Box 12 the Opportunities Arising From Text And Data Mining mentioning

confidence: 99%

Making Open Science a Reality

2015

OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers

107

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The integration of open access journals in the scholarly communication system: Three science fields

Cited by 35 publications

References 24 publications

The impact of open access on the medical literature: a review of current literature

The impact of open access on the medical literature: a review of current literature

Open Access Determinants and the Effect on Article Performance

Making Open Science a Reality

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About