The E2 proteins from oncogenic (high-risk) human papillomaviruses (HPVs) can induce apoptotic cell death in both HPV-transformed and non-HPV-transformed cells. Here we show that the E2 proteins from HPV type 6 (HPV6) and HPV11, two nononcogenic (low-risk) HPV types, fail to induce apoptosis. Unlike the high-risk HPV16 E2 protein, these low-risk E2 proteins fail to bind p53 and fail to induce p53-dependent transcription activation. Interestingly, neither the ability of p53 to activate transcription nor the ability of p53 to bind DNA, are required for HPV16 E2-induced apoptosis in non-HPV-transformed cells. However, mutations that reduce the binding of the HPV16 E2 protein to p53 inhibit E2-induced apoptosis in non-HPV-transformed cells. In contrast, the interaction between HPV16 E2 and p53 is not required for this E2 protein to induce apoptosis in HPV-transformed cells. Thus, our data suggest that this high-risk HPV E2 protein induces apoptosis via two pathways. One pathway involves the binding of E2 to p53 and can operate in both HPV-transformed and non-HPV-transformed cells. The second pathway requires the binding of E2 to the viral genome and can only operate in HPV-transformed cells.Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) that infect the genital tract can be divided into two groups. High-risk (HR) or oncogenic viral types, such as HR-HPV type 16 (HR-HPV16) and HR-HPV18, are associated with cervical cancer and some other human tumors (7). In contrast, low-risk (LR) or nononcogenic types, such as LR-HPV6 and LR-HPV11, cause genital warts and are not associated with cancer. An appreciation of the differences between the HR-and LR-HPV types is central to an understanding of the origins of cervical cancer and other HPV-induced diseases. The E6 and E7 proteins from HR-HPV have long been recognized to be oncoproteins (33), and significant differences in the properties of E6 and E7 proteins from HR and LR viral types have been identified. For example, the E6 proteins from HR-HPV16 and HR-HPV18 bind to the p53 tumor suppressor protein, resulting in increased degradation of p53 (22,41). Although the E6 proteins from LR-HPV6 and LR-HPV11 can also bind to p53, these interactions do not increase p53 degradation (6,28,41). The E7 proteins from HR-and LR-HPV types also show significant differences. Although the E7 proteins from HR-HPV16 and HR-HPV18 bind to the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein p105Rb in vitro, the E7 proteins from LR-HPV6 and LR-HPV11 bind this protein poorly (16,34). Interesting though these differences in the E6 and E7 proteins are, it is important to note that the HR-HPV infections are relatively common and the presence of an HR-HPV type does not therefore always result in oncogenesis (36). Thus, although these differences in the E6 and E7 proteins from different HPV types are undoubtedly important in the establishment and/or progression of cervical cancer, they cannot in themselves completely explain why some HPV types are oncogenic while others are not.In cervical warts the HPV genome exists as an extrach...