2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00125-009-1490-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The insulin glargine dilemma: an opportunity for the diabetes community?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14 , 15 The principal metabolic effects of metformin (i.e., decreased hepatic glucose production and improved insulin sensitivity) target two of the primary metabolic defects contributing to both fasting and postprandial hyperglycemia in patients with T2DM. 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 When used in combination, most oral antihyperglycemic agents do not demonstrate numerically additive reductions in mean hemoglobin A1c (HbA 1c ) values, 18 which likely is a reflection of the positive correlation between baseline glucose concentrations and the magnitude of treatment‐related glucose‐lowering effects. 19 This finding suggests that, if truly additive effects are to be manifested, each drug must contribute greater reductions in HbA 1c relative to monotherapy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 , 15 The principal metabolic effects of metformin (i.e., decreased hepatic glucose production and improved insulin sensitivity) target two of the primary metabolic defects contributing to both fasting and postprandial hyperglycemia in patients with T2DM. 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 When used in combination, most oral antihyperglycemic agents do not demonstrate numerically additive reductions in mean hemoglobin A1c (HbA 1c ) values, 18 which likely is a reflection of the positive correlation between baseline glucose concentrations and the magnitude of treatment‐related glucose‐lowering effects. 19 This finding suggests that, if truly additive effects are to be manifested, each drug must contribute greater reductions in HbA 1c relative to monotherapy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hernandez-Diaz et al claimed that current epidemiological evidence is insuffi cient to confi rm or refute a carcinogenic eff ect of explicit insulins in specifi c cancers and supposed further investigation on potential dose eff ect of insulin overall and insulin glargine in particular on colon and BC ( Hernandez-Diaz and Adami, 2010 ). The insulin dilemma on suspicion of promoting cancer on the one hand, stands in contrast to results in terms of oral insulin-sensitizing treat on the other hand ( Stumvoll and Nawroth, 2009 ). Recent in vitro, in vivo and fi rst clinical investigations have shown decreased risk of BC and tumor progression by metformin use.…”
Section: Eff Ects Of Diabetic Treatment On Breast Cancer ▼mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition serious criticisms have been raised regarding the publication strategy of the Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care. One important lesson to be learned from the glargine dilemma may therefore be to reassess communication and co‐operation between the different stakeholders in diabetes treatment (13).…”
Section: The Influence Of Glucose‐lowering Therapies On Cancer Risk Imentioning
confidence: 99%