Mathematics fluency is a critical component of mathematics learning yet few attempts have been made to synthesize this research base. Seventeen single-case design studies with 55 participants were reviewed using meta-analytic procedures. A component analysis of practice elements was conducted and treatment intensity and feasibility were examined. Findings suggest that drill and practice with modeling produced the largest effect sizes. Treatments with more than 3 components yielded higher effect sizes than those with fewer than 3, and a combination of treatment agents lead to better outcomes than a single agent. Other findings pertaining to prebaseline assessment, treatment time, experimental design employed, and treatment setting are also discussed.
About the AuthorsRobin S. Codding, PhD is currently an associate professor of school psychology at the University of Massachusetts, Boston. Her research interests include data-based decision-making, academic assessment and interventions, and treatment integrity.Gracia Lukito earned her EdS in school psychology at the University of Massachusetts-Boston and is currently employed as a school psychologist in the Quincy Public School District. Her research interests include data-based decision making and interventions.Matthew K. Burns, PhD is a professor of educational psychology and coordinator of the school psychology program at the University of Minnesota. He has published over 100 articles and book chapters on topics including response to intervention, assessing the instructional level, academic interventions, and facilitating problem-solving teams.