International Perspectives on the Management of Sport 2007
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-7506-8237-4.50012-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Institutional Dimension of the Sport Economy in Transition Countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, notwithstanding the increasing number of studies on sport policy, little attention has been paid to local and regional policies. Moreover, there has been a lack of English-language studies focusing on the area of Central and Eastern Europe and the particularities produced by the transition period, of which the decentralisation of sport governance is symptomatic (Poupaux and Andreff 2007). The objective of this study is to contribute towards filling this gap.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In this context, notwithstanding the increasing number of studies on sport policy, little attention has been paid to local and regional policies. Moreover, there has been a lack of English-language studies focusing on the area of Central and Eastern Europe and the particularities produced by the transition period, of which the decentralisation of sport governance is symptomatic (Poupaux and Andreff 2007). The objective of this study is to contribute towards filling this gap.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Economic and political transition and the break-up of the former Soviet Union have interrupted the series of high Olympic achievements by the Russian team (Poupaux and Andreff, 2007). With the transformational economic recession (Kornaï, 1994) the former Soviet sport system fell apiece (Andreff et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first emendation to Bernard and Busse model regards the political regime variable: Bernard and Busse rather crudely divided the world into communist regimes and capitalist market economies which obviously fits with the cold war period. Since then, this is too crude when it comes to so-called post-communist transition economies (Andreff, 2004(Andreff, , 2007 in particular as regard the sports economy sector which has differentiated a lot across former socialist countries during their institutional transformation (Poupaux and Andreff, 2007). Such differentiation has translated into a scattered efficiency in winning Olympic medals after 1991 (Rathke and Woitek, 2008).…”
Section: Estimating the Determinants Of A Nation Sport Performance Atmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite developing to a more liberal market orientation in the private economy, the sports system is more resistant to institutional change (Poupaux & Andreff, 2007). Applying a top-down approach, the MSiT still controls sports organisations and is responsible for elite sports funding (Zysko, 2008).…”
Section: Dual Career Environment In Switzerland Denmark and Polandmentioning
confidence: 99%