The Inspector 2014
DOI: 10.5040/9781636700403.00000007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Inspector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To model B 's available delay information, we consider the notion of updating periods : Customers' knowledge about the expected delay at B is updated at the end of each period, assuming that periods are long enough for the system stationarity. For example, published delays for some ERs are based on annual averages (Groeger, 2019). We index the updating periods by t , referring to the status quo as Period 0 (t=0$t=0$).…”
Section: Model Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To model B 's available delay information, we consider the notion of updating periods : Customers' knowledge about the expected delay at B is updated at the end of each period, assuming that periods are long enough for the system stationarity. For example, published delays for some ERs are based on annual averages (Groeger, 2019). We index the updating periods by t , referring to the status quo as Period 0 (t=0$t=0$).…”
Section: Model Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2004), we do not model customers as being able to infer B 's expected delay conditioned on A 's delay announcement. Instead, we let customers rely on the available historical average delay at B ; this type of information has become more readily available in the recent past (e.g., Perez, 2015; Groeger, 2019).…”
Section: Model Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%