The Inscriptions of Tiglath-Pileser III, King of Assyria

Tadmor, Hayim

doi:10.2307/503444

Cited by 8 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For a convenient historical overview of the Urartian advance to eastern Anatolia, see Hawkins (2000), 284b-285aand331a-332a. 1' Tadmor (1994), 58-63, Ann. 19*: 1-11.…”

Section: C Astour Restored Uru Ta-ga-ri-[md\ In the Preliminary Pmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Though the relevant part of the Annais from Calah^'' is fragmentary, it is significantly supplemented by another annalistic record preserved on Tadmor (1994), 100-101, St. I B: 21'-43'.This material is supplemented to a lesser though still significant degree by several inscriptions of summary (display) type (Tadmor [1994], 124-125, Summ. 1:20-22; 132-135, Summ.…”

Section: C Astour Restored Uru Ta-ga-ri-[md\ In the Preliminary Pmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Cf. Astour (1979), 7-9 for the historical analysis of these textual data, though it was written before the publication of the Iran Stele Fragment 3 in Tadmor (1994). Though the position of Kummuh at this time is not described clearly in the surviving accounts, Kummuh probably remained as an Assyrian dient and thus was attacked by Urartu (cf.…”

Section: C Astour Restored Uru Ta-ga-ri-[md\ In the Preliminary Pmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Though the position of Kummuh at this time is not described clearly in the surviving accounts, Kummuh probably remained as an Assyrian dient and thus was attacked by Urartu (cf. Tadmor [1994], 168-169, translation and note of Summ. 7: 46).…”

Section: C Astour Restored Uru Ta-ga-ri-[md\ In the Preliminary Pmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

The City of Togarma in Neo-Assyrian Sources

Yamada¹

2006

Altorientalische Forschungen

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A. Müller-Karpe drew my attention to the remains of a defensive wall on the mountain ridge of Kulma? Daglari, south of Ku §akli (Sarissa). He considers this wall to be the fortification system built by Sargon II following his conquest of Til-garimmu (Müller-Karpe et al. [1998], 109-112). It is perhaps not entirely impossible, in view of its location, to regard the wall as Assyrian, or more specifically, as a part of the defensive system "around" the land of Kammanu described in Sargon II's annals. However, it is too far north to be included in the land of Kammanu, roughly equated with the piain of Elbistan (see below). ^ Miliard (1994), 48 and 60 (B6, r. 8-10). E. Frahm (1998,116) reads further in the entry of the next year (B6, r. 15): "the dignitaries went against Kulummaeans (GAL-ME(S) ina UGU ^LÜ.Ku-lum-ma-a-a^ [...])".This implies, as Frahm suggests, that the Assyrian army went out against Gurdi to avenge the death of Sargon, though it does not appear to have achieved much success. « Tadmor(1958),97andnn.311-15.

show abstract

“…For a convenient historical overview of the Urartian advance to eastern Anatolia, see Hawkins (2000), 284b-285aand331a-332a. 1' Tadmor (1994), 58-63, Ann. 19*: 1-11.…”

Section: C Astour Restored Uru Ta-ga-ri-[md\ In the Preliminary Pmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: C Astour Restored Uru Ta-ga-ri-[md\ In the Preliminary Pmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: C Astour Restored Uru Ta-ga-ri-[md\ In the Preliminary Pmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: C Astour Restored Uru Ta-ga-ri-[md\ In the Preliminary Pmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The City of Togarma in Neo-Assyrian Sources

Yamada¹

2006

Altorientalische Forschungen

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…27, 5-6). This with some possible traces that may need further collation, and presumably formed the basis of Kö nig's drawing of an character appears at the very end of the Anatolian rulers in the Iran stele (Tadmor 1994 17 Sargon annals 68-71 (Fuchs 1993: 92-3). towards the line ends visible from the bottom of the tablet.…”

Section: ]-Ta-a-di Kurha-ti-i-na-hi-e (16) An-da-ni Itú-a-te-hi-ni-i mentioning

confidence: 99%

Tuwati and Wasusarma: Imitating the behaviour of Assyria

Weeden¹

2010

Iraq

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This essay reviews the evidence concerning the Tabalian king Wasusarma and his father Tuwati, who appear in Neo-Assyrian and Urartian annals. The context for the removal of Wasusarma ( Uassurme) from power by the Assyrian king is assumed to have lain in the events depicted in the large inscription of TOPADA. The historical and geographical import of this inscription is explored through a close reading of its historical portion, concluding that its background is set in a local struggle for power over north-western Cappadocia.The Neo-Hittite king Uassurme appears in the annals of the Assyrian king Tiglath-Pileser III for the years 738 and 732 bc as king of Tabal, and is attested in inscriptions from central Anatolia as king Wasusarma, son of Tuwati.2 The following article attempts a review and consolidation of the evidence concerning this king and his father, and is presented with special regard to new excavation projects, which may well soon present us with new data to work with. The main work on Wasusarma and Tuwati has previously been done by J. D. Hawkins over many years, and this essay relies heavily on his work as well as on discussions with him personally.3 I am sure that he will appreciate any slight disagreements as a gesture of the very high respect in which I hold him. Before looking at the main historical document from the reign of Wasusarma, the inscription of TOPADA, we will review the evidence from sources external to Anatolia, and introduce some of the geographical and archaeological background. The focus of this collection of evidence is placed on identifying the geo-political and historical framework in which Wasusarma and Tuwati operated in Anatolia, especially with reference to the Assyrian empire.

show abstract

At the Nexus of History and Memory: The Ten Lost Tribes

Barmash

2005

AJS Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In 883 CE, a man appeared in Kairouan, one of the centers of Jewish life at the time and told a tale about the lost tribes of the Northern Kingdom. He called himself Eldad and claimed to be from the tribe of Dan. Since then, the story of the Ten Lost Tribes—that the tribes of the Northern Kingdom still exist intact in a faraway land, living in exile beyond the sabbatical river, a mysterious body of water that was passable only on the Sabbath—has continued to generate excitement. It is astonishing, however, to realize that this motif did not develop until many centuries after the fall of the Northern Kingdom. After the destruction of the Northern Kingdom, many northerners remained in their ancestral homeland in the north. Other northerners lived among their southern compatriots in Judah after fleeing south, while deported northerners and southerners mingled in exile in Mesopotamia. It is only after the end of the Second Temple period that the notion of the Ten Lost Tribes, inviolable and unreachable, developed.

show abstract

The Inscriptions of Tiglath-Pileser III, King of Assyria

Cited by 8 publications

References 0 publications

The City of Togarma in Neo-Assyrian Sources

The City of Togarma in Neo-Assyrian Sources

Tuwati and Wasusarma: Imitating the behaviour of Assyria

At the Nexus of History and Memory: The Ten Lost Tribes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About