“…In a prospective study of patients with severe hematochezia, among those with a definitive diagnosis of diverticula hemorrhage, the source of bleeding was more likely to be diverticula in the proximal colon compared with the distal colon. 13 And in a recent analysis using data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, hospitalizations for diverticular bleeding were significantly more common in Blacks compared with Whites. 14 The greater burden of proximal diverticula in Blacks compared with Whites may contribute to this significant difference.…”
Background & Aims
Colonic diverticula are the most common finding from colonoscopy examinations. Little is known about the distribution of colonic diverticula, which are responsible for symptomatic and costly diverticular disease. We aimed to assess the number, location, and characteristics of colonic diverticula in a large US screening population.
Methods
We analyzed data from a prospective study of 624 patients (mean age, 54 years) undergoing screening colonoscopy at the University of North Carolina Hospital from 2013 through 2015. The examination included a detailed assessment of colonic diverticula. To assess the association between participant characteristics and diverticula, we used logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results
Of our population, 260 patients (42%) had one or more diverticula (mean number 14; range, 1–158). Participants with diverticula were more likely to be older, male, and have a higher body mass index than those without diverticula. The distribution of diverticula differed significantly by race. Among Whites, 75% of diverticula were in the sigmoid colon, 11% in the descending splenic flexure, 6% in the transverse colon, and 8% were in the ascending colon or hepatic flexure; in Blacks 64% of diverticula were in the sigmoid colon, 8% in the descending colon or splenic flexure, 7% in the transverse colon, and 20% in the ascending colon or hepatic flexure (P=.0008). The proportion of patients with diverticula increased with age: 35% were 50 years or younger, 40% were 51–60 years, and 58% were older than 60 years. The proportion of patients with more than 10 diverticula increased with age: 8% were 50 years or younger, 15% were 51–60 years, and 30% were older than 60 years.
Conclusions
Older individuals not only have a higher prevalence of diverticula than younger individuals, but also a greater density, indicating that this is a progressive disease. Blacks have a greater percentage of their diverticula in the proximal colon and fewer in the distal colon compared with Whites. Understanding the distribution and determinants of diverticula is the first step in preventing diverticulosis and its complications.
“…In a prospective study of patients with severe hematochezia, among those with a definitive diagnosis of diverticula hemorrhage, the source of bleeding was more likely to be diverticula in the proximal colon compared with the distal colon. 13 And in a recent analysis using data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, hospitalizations for diverticular bleeding were significantly more common in Blacks compared with Whites. 14 The greater burden of proximal diverticula in Blacks compared with Whites may contribute to this significant difference.…”
Background & Aims
Colonic diverticula are the most common finding from colonoscopy examinations. Little is known about the distribution of colonic diverticula, which are responsible for symptomatic and costly diverticular disease. We aimed to assess the number, location, and characteristics of colonic diverticula in a large US screening population.
Methods
We analyzed data from a prospective study of 624 patients (mean age, 54 years) undergoing screening colonoscopy at the University of North Carolina Hospital from 2013 through 2015. The examination included a detailed assessment of colonic diverticula. To assess the association between participant characteristics and diverticula, we used logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results
Of our population, 260 patients (42%) had one or more diverticula (mean number 14; range, 1–158). Participants with diverticula were more likely to be older, male, and have a higher body mass index than those without diverticula. The distribution of diverticula differed significantly by race. Among Whites, 75% of diverticula were in the sigmoid colon, 11% in the descending splenic flexure, 6% in the transverse colon, and 8% were in the ascending colon or hepatic flexure; in Blacks 64% of diverticula were in the sigmoid colon, 8% in the descending colon or splenic flexure, 7% in the transverse colon, and 20% in the ascending colon or hepatic flexure (P=.0008). The proportion of patients with diverticula increased with age: 35% were 50 years or younger, 40% were 51–60 years, and 58% were older than 60 years. The proportion of patients with more than 10 diverticula increased with age: 8% were 50 years or younger, 15% were 51–60 years, and 30% were older than 60 years.
Conclusions
Older individuals not only have a higher prevalence of diverticula than younger individuals, but also a greater density, indicating that this is a progressive disease. Blacks have a greater percentage of their diverticula in the proximal colon and fewer in the distal colon compared with Whites. Understanding the distribution and determinants of diverticula is the first step in preventing diverticulosis and its complications.
“…This represents a clinically significant reduction in the rebleeding rate and forms the basis for recommending a major change in the definitive diagnosis and treatment of diverticular hemorrhage. This moves away from the previous practice of angiography or colonic surgical resection to urgent colonoscopy [16]. It is also reported to be more cost effective [10, 11, 13••].…”
Section: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies report similar or lower rebleeding rates than with hemoclip placement and their benefit may be most pronounced in the right colon [17, 18]. However, this technique requires two colonoscopies and is not deemed to be as convenient or effective, particularly in Western patients, compared to hemostasis with thermal probes or hemoclips [16]. …”
Section: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Modalitiesmentioning
Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding from the colon is a common reason for hospitalization and is becoming more common in the elderly. While most cases will cease spontaneously, patients with ongoing bleeding or major stigmata of hemorrhage require urgent diagnosis and intervention to achieve definitive hemostasis. Colonoscopy is the primary modality for establishing a diagnosis, risk stratification, and treating some of the most common causes of colonic bleeding, including diverticular hemorrhage which is the etiology in 30 % of cases. Other interventions, including angiography and surgery, are usually reserved for instances of bleeding that cannot be stabilized or allow for adequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. We discuss the colonoscopic diagnosis, risk stratification, and definitive treatment of colonic hemorrhage in patients presenting with severe hematochezia.
“…After receiving standard supportive medical care including fluid resuscitation and hemodynamic monitoring, endoscopy was performed for the diagnosis and treatment of the bleeding lesions in the small bowel, including a duodenal vascular ectasia (one case), jejunal bleeding diverticulum (one case), ileal Dieulafoy's lesion (one case) and ileal bleeding diverticula (three cases). A bleeding diverticulum was defined as a diverticulum with stigmata of recent hemorrhage such as active bleeding, a non-bleeding visible vessel, or an adherent clot [26,27] . Informed written consent was obtained from all patients for endoscopy and EBL.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.