2012
DOI: 10.1038/msb.2012.49
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The inoculum effect and band‐pass bacterial response to periodic antibiotic treatment

Abstract: The efficacy of many antibiotics decreases with increasing bacterial density, a phenomenon called the ‘inoculum effect' (IE). This study reveals that, for ribosome-targeting antibiotics, IE is due to bistable inhibition of bacterial growth, which reduces the efficacy of certain treatment frequencies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
99
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(69 reference statements)
5
99
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These considerations are not applicable to the systems we study here, since wild type cells grew homogeneously in the presence of antibiotics tested, and only cells expressing drug resistance exhibited growth bistability when cultured in the presence of antibiotics. The observed growth bistability is also unlikely to arise from to a recently described inoculum effect (55), in which two separate cultures with identical concentration of certain drugs may exhibit distinct growth rates depending on the culture inoculant density: First, bacteriostatic drugs investigated here (Cm and Tc) have been shown not to exhibit the inoculum effect (55, 56). Second, the inoculum effect concerns the differences between separate cultures, whereas we observed coexistence of growing and non-growing subpopulations in a single homogeneous culture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…These considerations are not applicable to the systems we study here, since wild type cells grew homogeneously in the presence of antibiotics tested, and only cells expressing drug resistance exhibited growth bistability when cultured in the presence of antibiotics. The observed growth bistability is also unlikely to arise from to a recently described inoculum effect (55), in which two separate cultures with identical concentration of certain drugs may exhibit distinct growth rates depending on the culture inoculant density: First, bacteriostatic drugs investigated here (Cm and Tc) have been shown not to exhibit the inoculum effect (55, 56). Second, the inoculum effect concerns the differences between separate cultures, whereas we observed coexistence of growing and non-growing subpopulations in a single homogeneous culture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…While the qualitative concept of cellular phenotype as a product of protein(s) function is clear, the ability to deconstruct and accurately map the phenotype to physicochemical properties of a specific protein within the larger cellular milieu is an interesting challenge (Tan et al , 2012; Walkiewicz et al , 2012). We describe a general mathematical model that allows us to relate changes in fitness function to changes in biophysical behaviors and could be applied to any effluxer that contributes strongly to fitness over a set of environmental conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the development of novel drugs is a long and arduous process, underscoring the need for alternative approaches to forestall resistance evolution. Recent work has highlighted the promise of evolution-based strategies for optimizing and prolonging the efficacy of established drugs, including optimal dose scheduling 7-9 , antimicrobial stewardship 10,11 , drug cycling [12][13][14] , consideration of spatial dynamics 15,16 , cooperative dynamics [17][18][19][20] , or phenotypic resistance [21][22][23] , and judicious use of drug combinations [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] . In a similar spirit, a number of recent studies have suggested exploiting collateral sensitivity as a means for slowing or even reversing antibiotic resistance [32][33][34][35] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%