“…The time response of the sensor, defined as the interval needed to evolve from 10% to 90% of the step signal, was t r = 5 s. On the other hand, for steps involving higher values of R.H., such as 10-60% R.H., the sensor signal was slightly further away from a pure exponential behavior than for slow R.H., and a time constant of s = 3 s was found; the time response t r was 14.1 s. This scenario suggests that the diffusion coefficient decreases at high values of R.H. In any case, the sensor response is several folds faster than the response of the most part of the previously reported [23,30,31,33] sponds to e r = 3.8, in good agreement with different CAB manufacturers. The device presented a capacitance per surface area and sensitivity per surface area (at 10% R.H. and room temperature) of 48.1 pF mm À2 and 82 fF mm À2 per 1% R.H., respectively, which is around one order of magnitude higher than in previously reported printed capacitive gas sensors [23,30,33].…”