1958
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1958.tb08253.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Inhibitory Effect of Oxygen on the Growth of Wheat Roots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

1959
1959
1987
1987

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An oxy^ien tension in equilibrium with pure oxygen is supra-optimal for roots |cf. Eliasson 1958) in the present instance reducing the vohimc growth to one halt" the normal value, but the roots are thin witb no dwarf symptoms although the intercellularies are water-filled. The conspicuous result is that the stunted dwarf growth is prevented by oxygen, but the gas intercelliiltiries are not restored.…”
Section: Intercellularies In the Tipscontrasting
confidence: 39%
“…An oxy^ien tension in equilibrium with pure oxygen is supra-optimal for roots |cf. Eliasson 1958) in the present instance reducing the vohimc growth to one halt" the normal value, but the roots are thin witb no dwarf symptoms although the intercellularies are water-filled. The conspicuous result is that the stunted dwarf growth is prevented by oxygen, but the gas intercelliiltiries are not restored.…”
Section: Intercellularies In the Tipscontrasting
confidence: 39%
“…At pO, pressure above 0.32 MPa, germination ceased altogether (cf. Eliasson 1958). The general pattern of pressure effects was similar in water and in 0.2 M NaCl, although the absolute germination in the salt solution was lower than the control by some 10-15%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…They felt that 2 solubility and diffusion through the tissues was reduced by the water. (Eliasson, 1958 (1942) found that when oat seeds were soaked in oxygenated water, subsequent growth was inhibited when compared to aerated controls. (Mayer and Shain, 1974).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%