1946
DOI: 10.3382/ps.0250278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Inheritance of Egg Production and Hatchability in Turkeys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1950
1950
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that we may find higher h 2 values if these were based on egg production to 500 days as is usually the case with chickens. The work Wilson and Johnson (1946) also showed considerably higher h 2 value (26 percent) for hatchability than for egg production (2 percent). Meat yield per dam is the combined phenotypic expression of all reproductive traits plus one or two physical factors and therefore considerable interaction may be expected between heredity and environment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is possible that we may find higher h 2 values if these were based on egg production to 500 days as is usually the case with chickens. The work Wilson and Johnson (1946) also showed considerably higher h 2 value (26 percent) for hatchability than for egg production (2 percent). Meat yield per dam is the combined phenotypic expression of all reproductive traits plus one or two physical factors and therefore considerable interaction may be expected between heredity and environment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The intra-sire regression method of analysis, used by Wilson and Johnson (1946) obtained heritability estimates (h 2 ) of 2 and 26 percent for egg production and hatchability respectively. Abplanalp and Kosin (1952) made an extensive study of some body measurements in Broad Breasted Bronze (BBB) and Beltsville Small White (BSW) turkeys.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wilson and Johnson's (1946) study on hatchability and that of Blow et al (1951) on fertility appear to be the only published works treating the subject of the hereditary aspect of fertility and hatchability in turkeys from the standpoint of population genetics. Wilson and Johnson (1946) have estimated heritability of hatchability in their Broad Breasted Bronze turkeys to be 0.26. This is considerably above the reported corresponding figures in the chicken (Shoffner and Sloan, 1948).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Hatchabihty of fertile eggs from the outbred mating of Black turkeys was 81.6% as compared with 91.9% for the Beltsville Small White outbred mating. Wilson and Johnson (1946) in studies with Beltsville Small White, standardbred Bronze, and Broad Breasted Bronze turkeys showed that hatchabihty based on dam-daughter records was highly heritable (heritability value +.26). Their data indicated that, by selecting breeding stock for hatchabihty only-the hens from the highest-hatching 30% of the dams, the toms from the highest-hatching 10% of the dams-hatchabihty could be improved by about 6.5% in the next generation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%