The present paper addresses several connected issues that concern the mechanical properties of ultrafine grained martensitic steels. Recent research, particularly including EBSD studies, has clarified the complex microstructure of dislocated martensitic steels and shown the central importance of martensite blocks, which are subvolumes of laths that share a Bain variant of the parent austenite. The block-and-packet structure of the martensite appears well-designed to minimize the elastic energy introduced during the martensitic transformation. The martensite block is, ordinarily, the effective grain size for both strength and cleavage fracture. However, the role of the block in imparting strength is sensitive to carbon contamination of the block boundaries. To optimize strength carbon should be present; to minimize the ductile-brittle transition temperature it should be eliminated. When fine grain size produces high strength, it also causes low elongation. The elongation can be improved by including mechanisms, such as TRIP, that lower the initial work hardening rate.KEY WORDS: ultrafine-grained steel; martensitic steel; dislocated martensite microstructure; strength; toughness; ductility
1063© 2008 ISIJ Large prior austenite grains are divided into "packets" that are subdivided into "blocks" of martensite laths. When the blocks are small the laths are almost identical in their crystallography; they have the same KS variant. When the blocks are larger they are sometimes found to contain two interleaved KS variants in the specific pairs: V1-V4. V2-V5, V3-V6. When the blocks are interleaved pairs then the packets ordinarily contain three crystallographically distinct blocks, one made from each pair. When the blocks are single-variant the packets contain up to six distinct blocks so that each KS variant is represented.
The Structural Composition of Blocks andPackets The microstructure that is described by Maki et al. [3][4][5][6][7][8] can be understood from the elastic theory of phase transformations.The energetic considerations that influence the choice of martensite variant can be developed as follows.9,10) The bcc structure is derived from the fcc by applying the "Bain strain" illustrated in Fig. 2. The fcc structure is compressed by about 23 % along one cube axis and expanded by about 12 % along the perpendicular axes (depending on the volume change) to create bcc. Since there are three choices for the compression axis, the transformation produces three distinct "Bain variants".Of course, a Bain strain that is imposed within the bulk of a fcc crystal would require a prohibitively high elastic energy. As has long been recognized, [11][12][13] that energy is lowered dramatically if the Bain strain is supplemented by a rotation and a small shear to bring the close-packed (011) plane of the bcc product into registry with one of the closepacked {111} planes of the fcc parent, and orient the plane so that low-index crystallographic directions in the plane are also aligned. If we choose the [110] g direction in the (1...